Standard

A Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Concept for Welded Joints : Part 2: a supplement to the rule based S-N approach. / Lassen, T.; Sørensen, John Dalsgaard.

I: Marine Structures, Vol. 15, Nr. 6, 2002, s. 615-626.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Lassen, T.; Sørensen, John Dalsgaard / A Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Concept for Welded Joints : Part 2: a supplement to the rule based S-N approach.

I: Marine Structures, Vol. 15, Nr. 6, 2002, s. 615-626.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Bibtex

@article{43e40880809211db8b97000ea68e967b,
title = "A Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Concept for Welded Joints",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "T. Lassen and Sørensen, {John Dalsgaard}",
year = "2002",
volume = "15",
number = "6",
pages = "615--626",
journal = "Marine Structures",
issn = "0951-8339",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Concept for Welded Joints

T2 - Part 2: a supplement to the rule based S-N approach

A1 - Lassen,T.

A1 - Sørensen,John Dalsgaard

AU - Lassen,T.

AU - Sørensen,John Dalsgaard

PB - Elsevier Ltd.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The first part of this paper presented the required statistics and stochastic models for reliability analysis of the fatigue fracture of welded plate joints. This present Part 2 suggests a probabilistic damage tolerance supplement to the design S–N curves for welded joints. The goal is to provide the practising engineer with simple tools that predict the reliability against fatigue fracture during service life. The impact of the chosen fatigue design factors (FDF) and the uncertainty in the applied stresses is revealed. The effect of an in-service inspection programme is also predicted. The results are presented as dimensionless matrices and suggested for use in support of decision-making at the design stage, without any advanced fracture mechanics modelling and stochastic simulation. One important advantage of this format is that the probability levels are presented regardless of actual weld class and target service life (TSL). This is obtained by introducing the FDF as a key parameter to the results. This parameter is defined as the ratio of predicted fatigue life over TSL. FDF is always calculated in the S–N approach which is mandatory in fatigue life prediction. Various welded details (classes) will have the same reliability level for the same FDF. This is true at the end of TSL and at earlier stages, i.e. fractions of TSL. The absolute value of TSL is immaterial for a given FDF. In the case of in-service inspection, the inspection interval is also given without dimensions as a fraction of TSL. Only the influence of future scheduled inspections is treated. Updating based on actual inspection results is not included as the scope of work is inspection planning at the design stage. Results for some frequent cases occurring in practice are readily derived and presented.

AB - The first part of this paper presented the required statistics and stochastic models for reliability analysis of the fatigue fracture of welded plate joints. This present Part 2 suggests a probabilistic damage tolerance supplement to the design S–N curves for welded joints. The goal is to provide the practising engineer with simple tools that predict the reliability against fatigue fracture during service life. The impact of the chosen fatigue design factors (FDF) and the uncertainty in the applied stresses is revealed. The effect of an in-service inspection programme is also predicted. The results are presented as dimensionless matrices and suggested for use in support of decision-making at the design stage, without any advanced fracture mechanics modelling and stochastic simulation. One important advantage of this format is that the probability levels are presented regardless of actual weld class and target service life (TSL). This is obtained by introducing the FDF as a key parameter to the results. This parameter is defined as the ratio of predicted fatigue life over TSL. FDF is always calculated in the S–N approach which is mandatory in fatigue life prediction. Various welded details (classes) will have the same reliability level for the same FDF. This is true at the end of TSL and at earlier stages, i.e. fractions of TSL. The absolute value of TSL is immaterial for a given FDF. In the case of in-service inspection, the inspection interval is also given without dimensions as a fraction of TSL. Only the influence of future scheduled inspections is treated. Updating based on actual inspection results is not included as the scope of work is inspection planning at the design stage. Results for some frequent cases occurring in practice are readily derived and presented.

KW - Fatigue 

KW - Probabilistic model

KW - Fracture mechanics 

KW - Inspection planning 

KW - Welded joints.

KW - Fatigue 

KW - Probabilistic model

KW - Fracture mechanics 

KW - Inspection planning 

KW - Welded joints.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00021-7

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00021-7

JO - Marine Structures

JF - Marine Structures

SN - 0951-8339

IS - 6

VL - 15

SP - 615

EP - 626

ER -