Commentary: Usability in Theory and Practice

Jan Stage*

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary discusses Noam Tractinsky’s article “The Usability Construct: A Dead End?” (Human–Computer Interaction, 2017). That article debates the conceptual qualities of “usability” as a key concept in human–computer interaction. It provides two main conclusions: (a) the usefulness of the concept of “usability” to human–computer interaction theories has been limited and (b) a notion of “construct” is useful for identifying weaknesses of the concept of “usability” and thereby provides reasons for its limited usefulness. The article is interesting and provides an in-depth analysis of the concept of usability. Unfortunately, the use of this analysis is not convincing. Instead, redefinition of “usability” should be based on a constructive approach.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer10.1080/07370024.2017.1333908
TidsskriftHuman-Computer Interaction
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)195-197
Antal sider3
ISSN0737-0024
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Commentary: Usability in Theory and Practice'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater