Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK?

Mercédès Pavlicevic; Catherine Carr; Hilary  Moss; Julian O'Kelly; Simon  Procter; Alexia  Quin

Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK?

Mercédès Pavlicevic, Catherine Carr, Hilary Moss, Julian O'Kelly, Simon Procter, Alexia Quin

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceabstrakt i proceeding › Forskning › peer review

1764 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research is generally considered an essential aspect of professional development. Research helps to develop practices relevant to contemporary society: seeking to test and develop methods of practice; to ensure that reported outcomes and claims have robust evidence bases; testing that music therapy is worth the resources expended on its provisions; and hopefully making the world a better place.
At what cost, to whom?

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century : Book of Abstracts
Redaktører	Giorgos Tsiris, Catherine Warner, Grace Watts
Antal sider	1
Udgivelsessted	London
Forlag	British Association for Music Therapy
Publikationsdato	2014
Sider	25
ISBN (Trykt)	0-85513-017-2
Status	Udgivet - 2014
Udgivet eksternt	Ja
Begivenhed	First British Association of Music Therapists Conference: Counterpoints: Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century - Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham, Storbritannien Varighed: 21 feb. 2014 → 23 feb. 2014 Konferencens nummer: 1

Konference

Konference	First British Association of Music Therapists Conference
Nummer	1
Lokation	Birmingham Conservatoire
Land/Område	Storbritannien
By	Birmingham
Periode	21/02/2014 → 23/02/2014

Adgang til dokumentet

BAMT conference - Book of AbstractsIndsendt manuskript, 1,5 MB

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Citationsformater

Pavlicevic, M., Carr, C., Moss, H., O'Kelly, J., Procter, S., & Quin, A. (2014). Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK? I G. Tsiris, C. Warner, & G. Watts (red.), Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century: Book of Abstracts (s. 25). British Association for Music Therapy.

Pavlicevic, Mercédès ; Carr, Catherine ; Moss, Hilary et al. / Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions : How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK?. Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century: Book of Abstracts. red. / Giorgos Tsiris ; Catherine Warner ; Grace Watts. London : British Association for Music Therapy, 2014. s. 25

@inbook{0d40331adab74db5a2b42064af55e139,

title = "Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK?",

abstract = "Research is generally considered an essential aspect of professional development. Research helps to develop practices relevant to contemporary society: seeking to test and develop methods of practice; to ensure that reported outcomes and claims have robust evidence bases; testing that music therapy is worth the resources expended on its provisions; and hopefully making the world a better place.At what cost, to whom?This panel addresses the dilemmas about the nature of the link between practice and research, through questions that include: What kinds of {\textquoteleft}real world{\textquoteright} questions would help inform music therapy research? What kind of research might best serve funders, commissioners and sceptical managers?How representative of practice are large studies that are considered {\textquoteleft}gold standard{\textquoteright} by funders and the scientific community? How can practices best be served by research conventions that isolate and reduce the complexity of music therapy to outcome measures – that may be imported from other fields of practice? What kind of violence do research and practice do to one another? (When and how do research (methodological) imperatives compromise practice?) How might clients{\textquoteright} wellbeing best be enhanced through research? Since no research approach can serve multiple purposes, what kind of focussed approaches should we be considering for what purposes?",

author = "Merc{\'e}d{\`e}s Pavlicevic and Catherine Carr and Hilary Moss and Julian O'Kelly and Simon Procter and Alexia Quin",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

isbn = "0-85513-017-2",

pages = "25",

editor = "Giorgos Tsiris and Catherine Warner and Grace Watts",

booktitle = "Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century",

publisher = "British Association for Music Therapy",

note = "British Association of Music Therapists Conference : Counterpoints: Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century{\textquoteright}, BAMT Conference ; Conference date: 21-02-2014 Through 23-02-2014",

}

Pavlicevic, M, Carr, C, Moss, H, O'Kelly, J, Procter, S & Quin, A 2014, Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK? i G Tsiris, C Warner & G Watts (red), Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century: Book of Abstracts. British Association for Music Therapy, London, s. 25, First British Association of Music Therapists Conference, Birmingham, Storbritannien, 21/02/2014.

Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK? / Pavlicevic, Mercédès; Carr, Catherine; Moss, Hilary et al.
Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century: Book of Abstracts. red. / Giorgos Tsiris; Catherine Warner; Grace Watts. London: British Association for Music Therapy, 2014. s. 25.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceabstrakt i proceeding › Forskning › peer review

TY - ABST

T1 - Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions

T2 - British Association of Music Therapists Conference

AU - Pavlicevic, Mercédès

AU - Carr, Catherine

AU - Moss, Hilary

AU - O'Kelly, Julian

AU - Procter, Simon

AU - Quin, Alexia

N1 - Conference code: 1

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Research is generally considered an essential aspect of professional development. Research helps to develop practices relevant to contemporary society: seeking to test and develop methods of practice; to ensure that reported outcomes and claims have robust evidence bases; testing that music therapy is worth the resources expended on its provisions; and hopefully making the world a better place.At what cost, to whom?This panel addresses the dilemmas about the nature of the link between practice and research, through questions that include: What kinds of ‘real world’ questions would help inform music therapy research? What kind of research might best serve funders, commissioners and sceptical managers?How representative of practice are large studies that are considered ‘gold standard’ by funders and the scientific community? How can practices best be served by research conventions that isolate and reduce the complexity of music therapy to outcome measures – that may be imported from other fields of practice? What kind of violence do research and practice do to one another? (When and how do research (methodological) imperatives compromise practice?) How might clients’ wellbeing best be enhanced through research? Since no research approach can serve multiple purposes, what kind of focussed approaches should we be considering for what purposes?

AB - Research is generally considered an essential aspect of professional development. Research helps to develop practices relevant to contemporary society: seeking to test and develop methods of practice; to ensure that reported outcomes and claims have robust evidence bases; testing that music therapy is worth the resources expended on its provisions; and hopefully making the world a better place.At what cost, to whom?This panel addresses the dilemmas about the nature of the link between practice and research, through questions that include: What kinds of ‘real world’ questions would help inform music therapy research? What kind of research might best serve funders, commissioners and sceptical managers?How representative of practice are large studies that are considered ‘gold standard’ by funders and the scientific community? How can practices best be served by research conventions that isolate and reduce the complexity of music therapy to outcome measures – that may be imported from other fields of practice? What kind of violence do research and practice do to one another? (When and how do research (methodological) imperatives compromise practice?) How might clients’ wellbeing best be enhanced through research? Since no research approach can serve multiple purposes, what kind of focussed approaches should we be considering for what purposes?

M3 - Conference abstract in proceeding

SN - 0-85513-017-2

SP - 25

BT - Music Therapy Practice in the 21st Century

A2 - Tsiris, Giorgos

A2 - Warner, Catherine

A2 - Watts, Grace

PB - British Association for Music Therapy

CY - London

Y2 - 21 February 2014 through 23 February 2014

ER -

Conventions, confrontations, compatibilities and collusions: How can music therapy research be compatible with practice in contemporary UK?

Abstract

Konference

Adgang til dokumentet

AUB Link

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater