Culture in constructive remembering

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewBidrag til bog/antologi

Standard

Culture in constructive remembering. / Wagoner, Brady.

The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. red. / Jaan Valsiner. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewBidrag til bog/antologi

Harvard

Wagoner, B 2012, 'Culture in constructive remembering'. i J Valsiner (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford University Press.

APA

Wagoner, B. (2012). Culture in constructive remembering. I Valsiner, J. (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Kapitel 49.Oxford University Press.

CBE

Wagoner B. 2012. Culture in constructive remembering. Valsiner J, red. I The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford University Press.

MLA

Wagoner, Brady "Culture in constructive remembering". Valsiner, Jaan (red.). The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Kapitel 49, Oxford University Press. 2012.

Vancouver

Wagoner B. Culture in constructive remembering. I Valsiner J, red., The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford University Press. 2012.

Author

Wagoner, Brady / Culture in constructive remembering.

The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. red. / Jaan Valsiner. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewBidrag til bog/antologi

Bibtex

@inbook{27fb7bbc433340df93e5d1e76409ef00,
title = "Culture in constructive remembering",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
author = "Brady Wagoner",
note = "2012; 49",
year = "2012",
editor = "Jaan Valsiner",
isbn = "978-0-19-539643-0",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Culture in constructive remembering

A1 - Wagoner,Brady

AU - Wagoner,Brady

PB - Oxford University Press

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - The present chapter explores novel ways of thinking about what it means to remember and how precisely culture is involved in this process. Since Plato, the dominant metaphor for conceptualizing memory has been that of a spatial ‘storage’. In contrast to this, Frederic Bartlett advanced an alternative temporal metaphor of remembering as ‘construction’. If we push his metaphor further—with the help of cultural psychology—we can say memory construction is done by agents using cultural ‘tools’ such as language and narrative. In this chapter, Bartlett’s theory is contextualized, elucidated, critiqued and developed with the help of a number of other thinkers. The ultimate aim of the chapter is to go beyond Bartlett and arrive at a thoroughgoing culturally inclusive psychological theory of remembering. Though Bartlett clearly situated remembering within a social process, he did not provide a social mechanism through which acts of remembering become possible. By contrast, Mead, Halbwachs and Vygotsky, argue that remembering becomes possible through signs or symbols which experientially carry us outside of our embodied first person perspective into the perspectives of social others. The activity of remembering is itself a process of dynamically integrating suggestions from self and others. The tension between perspectives is what drives the process of remembering and ensures its creativity and constructiveness.

AB - The present chapter explores novel ways of thinking about what it means to remember and how precisely culture is involved in this process. Since Plato, the dominant metaphor for conceptualizing memory has been that of a spatial ‘storage’. In contrast to this, Frederic Bartlett advanced an alternative temporal metaphor of remembering as ‘construction’. If we push his metaphor further—with the help of cultural psychology—we can say memory construction is done by agents using cultural ‘tools’ such as language and narrative. In this chapter, Bartlett’s theory is contextualized, elucidated, critiqued and developed with the help of a number of other thinkers. The ultimate aim of the chapter is to go beyond Bartlett and arrive at a thoroughgoing culturally inclusive psychological theory of remembering. Though Bartlett clearly situated remembering within a social process, he did not provide a social mechanism through which acts of remembering become possible. By contrast, Mead, Halbwachs and Vygotsky, argue that remembering becomes possible through signs or symbols which experientially carry us outside of our embodied first person perspective into the perspectives of social others. The activity of remembering is itself a process of dynamically integrating suggestions from self and others. The tension between perspectives is what drives the process of remembering and ensures its creativity and constructiveness.

SN - 978-0-19-539643-0

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology

T2 - The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology

A2 - Valsiner,Jaan

ED - Valsiner,Jaan

ER -