Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation

Janne Jul Jensen

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation

Janne Jul Jensen

Institut for Datalogi

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceartikel i proceeding › Forskning › peer review

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The think-aloud protocol, also known as concurrent verbalisation protocol, is widely used in the field of HCI today, but as the technology and applications have evolved the protocol has had to cope with this. Therefore new variations of the protocol have seen the light of day. One example is retrospective verbalisation. To compare concurrent and retrospective verbalisation an experiment was conducted. A home healthcare application was evaluated with 15 participants using both protocols. The results of the experiment show that the two protocols have each their strengths and weaknesses, and as such are very equally good although very different.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability : 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings
Redaktører	Julie A. Jacko
Antal sider	9
Vol/bind	1
Forlag	Springer
Publikationsdato	2007
Sider	508-516
ISBN (Trykt)	978-3-540-73104-7
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56
Status	Udgivet - 2007
Begivenhed	HCI International 2007 - Beijing, Kina Varighed: 22 jul. 2007 → 27 jul. 2007 Konferencens nummer: 12

Konference

Konference	HCI International 2007
Nummer	12
Land/Område	Kina
By	Beijing
Periode	22/07/2007 → 27/07/2007

Navn	Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Nummer	4550
Vol/bind	1
ISSN	0302-9743

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

http://www.springerlink.com/content/05gx5ul38772n454/?p=2931b1dada2b4eae905269e5de65b157&pi=55

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

The USE project (2005-08)
Stage, J., Skov, M. B., Howard, S., Als, B. S., Høegh, R. T. H. & Jensen, J. J.
Danish Research Agency
01/01/2005 → 31/12/2008
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning

Citationsformater

Jensen, J. J. (2007). Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation. I J. A. Jacko (red.), Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings (Bind 1, s. 508-516). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

Jensen, Janne Jul. / Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting : A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation. Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings. red. / Julie A. Jacko. Bind 1 Springer, 2007. s. 508-516 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Nr. 4550, Bind 1).

@inproceedings{3072bb30beac11dca96e000ea68e967b,

title = "Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation",

abstract = "The think-aloud protocol, also known as concurrent verbalisation protocol, is widely used in the field of HCI today, but as the technology and applications have evolved the protocol has had to cope with this. Therefore new variations of the protocol have seen the light of day. One example is retrospective verbalisation. To compare concurrent and retrospective verbalisation an experiment was conducted. A home healthcare application was evaluated with 15 participants using both protocols. The results of the experiment show that the two protocols have each their strengths and weaknesses, and as such are very equally good although very different.",

keywords = "Verbalisation, Evaluation, Usability, Healthcare",

author = "Jensen, {Janne Jul}",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-540-73104-7",

volume = "1",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "4550",

pages = "508--516",

editor = "{A. Jacko}, Julie",

booktitle = "Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability",

address = "Germany",

note = "HCI International 2007 ; Conference date: 22-07-2007 Through 27-07-2007",

}

Jensen, JJ 2007, Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation. i J A. Jacko (red.), Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings. bind 1, Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, nr. 4550, bind 1, s. 508-516, HCI International 2007, Beijing, Kina, 22/07/2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation. / Jensen, Janne Jul.
Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings. red. / Julie A. Jacko. Bind 1 Springer, 2007. s. 508-516 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Nr. 4550, Bind 1).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceartikel i proceeding › Forskning › peer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting

T2 - HCI International 2007

AU - Jensen, Janne Jul

N1 - Conference code: 12

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The think-aloud protocol, also known as concurrent verbalisation protocol, is widely used in the field of HCI today, but as the technology and applications have evolved the protocol has had to cope with this. Therefore new variations of the protocol have seen the light of day. One example is retrospective verbalisation. To compare concurrent and retrospective verbalisation an experiment was conducted. A home healthcare application was evaluated with 15 participants using both protocols. The results of the experiment show that the two protocols have each their strengths and weaknesses, and as such are very equally good although very different.

AB - The think-aloud protocol, also known as concurrent verbalisation protocol, is widely used in the field of HCI today, but as the technology and applications have evolved the protocol has had to cope with this. Therefore new variations of the protocol have seen the light of day. One example is retrospective verbalisation. To compare concurrent and retrospective verbalisation an experiment was conducted. A home healthcare application was evaluated with 15 participants using both protocols. The results of the experiment show that the two protocols have each their strengths and weaknesses, and as such are very equally good although very different.

KW - Verbalisation

KW - Evaluation

KW - Usability

KW - Healthcare

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

DO - 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

M3 - Article in proceeding

SN - 978-3-540-73104-7

VL - 1

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SP - 508

EP - 516

BT - Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability

A2 - A. Jacko, Julie

PB - Springer

Y2 - 22 July 2007 through 27 July 2007

ER -

Jensen JJ. Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation. I A. Jacko J, red., Human-Computer Interaction - Interaction Design and Usability: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007 Beijing, China, July 2007 Proceedings. Bind 1. Springer. 2007. s. 508-516. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Nr. 4550, Bind 1). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_56

Evaluating in a Healthcare Setting: A Comparison between Concurrent and Retrospective Verbalisation

Abstract

Konference

Adgang til dokumentet

AUB Link

Fingeraftryk

Projekter

The USE project (2005-08)

Citationsformater