Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
Publikation: Forskning - peer review › Tidsskriftartikel
Standard
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. / Flyvbjerg, Bent.
I: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, Nr. 2, 2006, s. 219-245.Publikation: Forskning - peer review › Tidsskriftartikel
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
A1 - Flyvbjerg,Bent
AU - Flyvbjerg,Bent
PB - Sage Publications, Inc. Sage Publications Ltd.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.
AB - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.
U2 - 10.1177/1077800405284363
DO - 10.1177/1077800405284363
JO - Qualitative Inquiry
JF - Qualitative Inquiry
SN - 1077-8004
IS - 2
VL - 12
SP - 219
EP - 245
ER -