Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Standard

Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. / Flyvbjerg, Bent.

I: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, Nr. 2, 2006, s. 219-245.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Harvard

APA

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Flyvbjerg, Bent / Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.

I: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, Nr. 2, 2006, s. 219-245.

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Bibtex

@article{274af22073cb11dbabfe000ea68e967b,
title = "Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc. Sage Publications Ltd.",
author = "Bent Flyvbjerg",
year = "2006",
volume = "12",
number = "2",
pages = "219--245",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

A1 - Flyvbjerg,Bent

AU - Flyvbjerg,Bent

PB - Sage Publications, Inc. Sage Publications Ltd.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

AB - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

U2 - 10.1177/1077800405284363

DO - 10.1177/1077800405284363

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 2

VL - 12

SP - 219

EP - 245

ER -