Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones

Amin Asadi, Nader Rahbar, Meisam Asadi, Fahime Asadi, Kokab Khalili Paji

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

20 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to introduce some online-based approaches to evaluate scientific journals and publishers and to differentiate them from the hijacked ones, regardless of their disciplines. With the advent of open-access journals, many hijacked journals and publishers have deceitfully assumed the mantle of authenticity in order to take advantage of researchers and students. Although these hijacked journals and publishers can be identified through checking their advertisement techniques and their websites, these ways do not always result in their identification. There exist certain online-based approaches, such as using Master Journal List provided by Thomson Reuters, and Scopus database, and using the DOI of a paper, to certify the realness of a journal or publisher. It is indispensable that inexperienced students and researchers know these methods so as to identify hijacked journals and publishers with a higher level of probability.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScience and Engineering Ethics
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)305-308
Antal sider4
ISSN1353-3452
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2017
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater