Quantitative risk-cost-benefit analysis of selected mitigation options for two case studies

H. Narasimhan; Michael Havbro Faber Nielsen; A Remaitre; J. P. Malet; U Eidsvig; S Hochrainer-Stigler; Leonardo Cascini; Settimio Ferlisi

Quantitative risk-cost-benefit analysis of selected mitigation options for two case studies

H. Narasimhan, Michael Havbro Faber Nielsen, A Remaitre, J. P. Malet, U Eidsvig, S Hochrainer-Stigler, Leonardo Cascini, Settimio Ferlisi

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning

Abstract

Decision making in general is a difficult issue due to the significant underlying uncertainties and complex interrelation of events and choices affecting the benefits and losses associated with decisions. Typical decision problems are subject to a combination of inherent, modelling and statistical uncertainties. This is primarily due to the fact that our understanding of the issues involved in the decision problems is often far less than perfect and that it is only possible to model the involved processes of physical phenomena as well as human …

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	ETH Zurich
Status	Udgivet - 2012
Udgivet eksternt	Ja

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Citationsformater

@article{ef2ae9fbbfa74cecb321135744e67f0c,

title = "Quantitative risk-cost-benefit analysis of selected mitigation options for two case studies",

abstract = "Decision making in general is a difficult issue due to the significant underlying uncertainties and complex interrelation of events and choices affecting the benefits and losses associated with decisions. Typical decision problems are subject to a combination of inherent, modelling and statistical uncertainties. This is primarily due to the fact that our understanding of the issues involved in the decision problems is often far less than perfect and that it is only possible to model the involved processes of physical phenomena as well as human …",

author = "H. Narasimhan and Nielsen, {Michael Havbro Faber} and A Remaitre and Malet, {J. P.} and U Eidsvig and S Hochrainer-Stigler and Leonardo Cascini and Settimio Ferlisi",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

journal = "ETH Zurich",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative risk-cost-benefit analysis of selected mitigation options for two case studies

AU - Narasimhan, H.

AU - Nielsen, Michael Havbro Faber

AU - Remaitre, A

AU - Malet, J. P.

AU - Eidsvig, U

AU - Hochrainer-Stigler, S

AU - Cascini, Leonardo

AU - Ferlisi, Settimio

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Decision making in general is a difficult issue due to the significant underlying uncertainties and complex interrelation of events and choices affecting the benefits and losses associated with decisions. Typical decision problems are subject to a combination of inherent, modelling and statistical uncertainties. This is primarily due to the fact that our understanding of the issues involved in the decision problems is often far less than perfect and that it is only possible to model the involved processes of physical phenomena as well as human …

AB - Decision making in general is a difficult issue due to the significant underlying uncertainties and complex interrelation of events and choices affecting the benefits and losses associated with decisions. Typical decision problems are subject to a combination of inherent, modelling and statistical uncertainties. This is primarily due to the fact that our understanding of the issues involved in the decision problems is often far less than perfect and that it is only possible to model the involved processes of physical phenomena as well as human …

M3 - Journal article

JO - ETH Zurich

JF - ETH Zurich

ER -