TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing physical risk factors in construction work through a participatory intervention
T2 - Protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation
AU - Ajslev, Jeppe
AU - Brandt, Mikkel
AU - Møller, Jeppe Lykke
AU - Skals, Sebastian
AU - Vinstrup, Jonas
AU - Jakobsen, Markus Due
AU - Sundstrup, Emil
AU - Madeleine, Pascal
AU - Andersen, Lars L.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that reducing physical workload among workers in the construction industry is complicated. In order to address this issue, we developed a process evaluation in a formative mixed-methods design, drawing on existing knowledge of the potential barriers for implementation.OBJECTIVE: We present the design of a mixed-methods process evaluation of the organizational, social, and subjective practices that play roles in the intervention study, integrating technical measurements to detect excessive physical exertion measured with electromyography and accelerometers, video documentation of working tasks, and a 3-phased workshop program.METHODS: The evaluation is designed in an adapted process evaluation framework, addressing recruitment, reach, fidelity, satisfaction, intervention delivery, intervention received, and context of the intervention companies. Observational studies, interviews, and questionnaires among 80 construction workers organized in 20 work gangs, as well as health and safety staff, contribute to the creation of knowledge about these phenomena.RESULTS: At the time of publication, the process of participant recruitment is underway.CONCLUSIONS: Intervention studies are challenging to conduct and evaluate in the construction industry, often because of narrow time frames and ever-changing contexts. The mixed-methods design presents opportunities for obtaining detailed knowledge of the practices intra-acting with the intervention, while offering the opportunity to customize parts of the intervention.
AB - BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that reducing physical workload among workers in the construction industry is complicated. In order to address this issue, we developed a process evaluation in a formative mixed-methods design, drawing on existing knowledge of the potential barriers for implementation.OBJECTIVE: We present the design of a mixed-methods process evaluation of the organizational, social, and subjective practices that play roles in the intervention study, integrating technical measurements to detect excessive physical exertion measured with electromyography and accelerometers, video documentation of working tasks, and a 3-phased workshop program.METHODS: The evaluation is designed in an adapted process evaluation framework, addressing recruitment, reach, fidelity, satisfaction, intervention delivery, intervention received, and context of the intervention companies. Observational studies, interviews, and questionnaires among 80 construction workers organized in 20 work gangs, as well as health and safety staff, contribute to the creation of knowledge about these phenomena.RESULTS: At the time of publication, the process of participant recruitment is underway.CONCLUSIONS: Intervention studies are challenging to conduct and evaluate in the construction industry, often because of narrow time frames and ever-changing contexts. The mixed-methods design presents opportunities for obtaining detailed knowledge of the practices intra-acting with the intervention, while offering the opportunity to customize parts of the intervention.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.2196/resprot.5648
DO - 10.2196/resprot.5648
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27230696
SN - 1929-0748
VL - 5
JO - JMIR Research Protocols
JF - JMIR Research Protocols
IS - 2
M1 - e89
ER -