A Mendelian randomization study of circulating uric acid and type 2 diabetes

Ivonne Sluijs, Michael V Holmes, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Joline Wj Beulens, Folkert W Asselbergs, José María Huerta, Tom M Palmer, Larraitz Arriola, Beverley Balkau, Aurelio Barricarte, Heiner Boeing, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Guy Fagherazzi, Paul W Franks, Diana Gavrila, Rudolf Kaaks, Kay Tee Khaw, Tilman Kühn, Esther Molina-Montes, Lotte Maxild MortensenPeter M Nilsson, Kim Overvad, Domenico Palli, Salvatore Panico, J Ramón Quirós, Olov Rolandsson, Carlotta Sacerdote, Núria Sala, Julie A Schmidt, Robert A Scott, Sabina Sieri, Nadia Slimani, Annemieke Mw Spijkerman, Anne Tjonneland, Ruth C Travis Dphil, Rosario Tumino, Daphne L van der A, Stephen J Sharp, Nita G Forouhi, Claudia Langenberg, Elio Riboli, Nicholas J Wareham, InterAct consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the causal effect of circulating uric acid concentrations on type 2 diabetes risk. A Mendelian randomization study was performed using a genetic score with 24 uric acid associated loci. We used data of the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study, comprising 24,265 individuals of European ancestry from eight European countries. During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10 (4) years, 10,576 verified incident type 2 diabetes cases were ascertained. Higher uric acid associated with higher diabetes risk following adjustment for confounders, with a HR of 1.20 (95%CI: 1.11,1.30) per 59.48 µmol/L (1 mg/dL) uric acid. The genetic score raised uric acid by 17 µmol/L (95%CI: 15,18) per SD increase, and explained 4% of uric acid variation. Using the genetic score to estimate the unconfounded effect found that a 59.48 µmol/L higher uric acid concentration did not have a causal effect on diabetes (HR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.87,1.16). Including data from DIAGRAM consortium, increasing our dataset to 41,508 diabetes cases, the summary OR estimate was 0.99 (95%CI: 0.92, 1.06). In conclusion, our study does not support a causal effect of circulating uric acid on diabetes risk. Uric acid lowering therapies may therefore not be beneficial in reducing diabetes risk.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes
Volume64
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)3028-3036
Number of pages9
ISSN0012-1797
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Mendelian randomization study of circulating uric acid and type 2 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this