A study of twenty-one cases of low-frequency noise complaints
Publication: Research › Conference abstract in proceeding
Standard
A study of twenty-one cases of low-frequency noise complaints. / Pedersen, Christian Sejer; Møller, Henrik; Persson-Waye, Kerstin.
Proceedings of Acoustics '08. Société Francaise d'Acoustique, 2008.Publication: Research › Conference abstract in proceeding
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - ABST
T1 - A study of twenty-one cases of low-frequency noise complaints
A1 - Pedersen,Christian Sejer
A1 - Møller,Henrik
A1 - Persson-Waye,Kerstin
AU - Pedersen,Christian Sejer
AU - Møller,Henrik
AU - Persson-Waye,Kerstin
PB - Société Francaise d'Acoustique
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - From 203 cases of low-frequency complaints a random selection of twenty-one previously unsolved cases were investigated. The main aim of the investigation was to answer the question whether the annoyance is caused by an external physical sound or by a physically non-existing sound, i.e. low-frequency tinnitus. Noise recordings were made in the homes of the complainants, and the complainants were exposed to these in blind test listening experiments. Furthermore, the low-frequency hearing function of the complainants was investigated, and characteristics of the annoying sound was matched. The results showed that some of the complainants are annoyed by a physical sound (20-180 Hz), while others suffer from low-frequency tinnitus (perceived frequency 40-100 Hz). Physical sound at frequencies below 20 Hz (infrasound) is not responsible for the annoyance - or at all audible - in any of the investigated cases, and none of the complainants has extraordinary hearing sensitivity at low frequencies. For comparable cases of low-frequency noise complaints in general, it is anticipated that physical sound is responsible in a substantial part of the cases, while lowfrequency tinnitus is responsible in another substantial part of the cases.
AB - From 203 cases of low-frequency complaints a random selection of twenty-one previously unsolved cases were investigated. The main aim of the investigation was to answer the question whether the annoyance is caused by an external physical sound or by a physically non-existing sound, i.e. low-frequency tinnitus. Noise recordings were made in the homes of the complainants, and the complainants were exposed to these in blind test listening experiments. Furthermore, the low-frequency hearing function of the complainants was investigated, and characteristics of the annoying sound was matched. The results showed that some of the complainants are annoyed by a physical sound (20-180 Hz), while others suffer from low-frequency tinnitus (perceived frequency 40-100 Hz). Physical sound at frequencies below 20 Hz (infrasound) is not responsible for the annoyance - or at all audible - in any of the investigated cases, and none of the complainants has extraordinary hearing sensitivity at low frequencies. For comparable cases of low-frequency noise complaints in general, it is anticipated that physical sound is responsible in a substantial part of the cases, while lowfrequency tinnitus is responsible in another substantial part of the cases.
UR - http://intellagence.eu.com/acoustics2008/acoustics2008/cd1/data/index.html
BT - Proceedings of Acoustics '08
T2 - Proceedings of Acoustics '08
ER -