Acute intestinal failure: International multicenter point-of-prevalence study

Annika Reintam Blaser*, Ilse Ploegmakers, Michael Benoit, Mette Holst, Henrik Hojgaard Rasmussen, Rosa Burgos, Alastair Forbes, Jon Shaffer, Simon Gabe, Oivind Irtun, Ronan Thibault, Stanislaw Klek, Steven WM Olde Damink, Marcel van de Poll, Marina Panisic-Sekeljic, Geert Wanten, Loris Pironi, Vladislav Mihnovits, Antonina Britenkova, Kadri LindIvan Pertsev, Gregor Lansche, Anna Simona Sasdelli, Zsolt Bodnar, Francisco Pracca, Italo Bioni, Gintautas Kekstas, Karolina Venlavicute, Pietro Vecchiarelli, Zeljko Krznaric, Ana Kunovic, Ramiro Manzano Nunez, Carlos A. Ordonez, Hanna Liis Lepp, Charlene Compher, Marianne Aloupis, Nizar Senussi, Ana Zugasti Murillo, María Maíz-Jiménez, Pilar Matia, Carmina Wanden-Berghe, Wojciech Dabrowski, AIF study group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background & aims: Intestinal failure (IF) is defined from a requirement or intravenous supplementation due to failing capacity to absorb nutrients and fluids. Acute IF is an acute, potentially reversible form of IF. We aimed to identify the prevalence, underlying causes and outcomes of acute IF. Methods: This point-of-prevalence study included all adult patients hospitalized in acute care hospitals and receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) on a study day. The reason for PN and the mechanism of IF (if present) were documented by local investigators and reviewed by an expert panel. Results: Twenty-three hospitals (19 university, 4 regional) with a total capacity of 16,356 acute care beds and 1237 intensive care unit (ICU) beds participated in this study. On the study day, 338 patients received PN (21 patients/1000 acute care beds) and 206 (13/1000) were categorized as acute IF. The categorization of reason for PN was revised in 64 cases (18.9% of total) in consensus between the expert panel and investigators. Hospital mortality of all study patients was 21.5%; the median hospital stay was 36 days. Patients with acute IF had a hospital mortality of 20.5% and median hospital stay of 38 days (P > 0.05 for both outcomes). Disordered gut motility (e.g. ileus) was the most common mechanism of acute IF, and 71.5% of patients with acute IF had undergone abdominal surgery. Duration of PN of ≥42 days was identified as being the best cut-off predicting hospital mortality within 90 days. PN ≥ 42 days, age, sepsis and ICU admission were independently associated with 90-day hospital mortality. Conclusions: Around 2% of adult patients in acute care hospitals received PN, 60% of them due to acute IF. High 90-day hospital mortality and long hospital stay were observed in patients receiving PN, whereas presence of acute IF did not additionally influence these outcomes. Duration of PN was associated with increased 90-day hospital mortality.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Nutrition
Volume39
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)151-158
Number of pages8
ISSN0261-5614
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Abdominal surgery
  • Acute
  • Epidemiology
  • Intestinal failure
  • Mortality
  • Parenteral nutrition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acute intestinal failure: International multicenter point-of-prevalence study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this