Balancing methodological rigor and the needs of research participants: A Debate on Alternative Approaches to Sensitive Research

S Chan; E Teram; Ian Frank Shaw

doi:10.1177/1049732315605272

Balancing methodological rigor and the needs of research participants: A Debate on Alternative Approaches to Sensitive Research

S Chan, E Teram, Ian Frank Shaw

Department of Sociology and Social Work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	Qualitative Health Research
Volume	27
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	260-270
ISSN	1049-7323
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315605272
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

10.1177/1049732315605272

AUB Link

Search for the material in Aalborg University Library's search engine

Cite this

@article{89185daaa7ee4b73b6352fb4ba459f09,

title = "Balancing methodological rigor and the needs of research participants: A Debate on Alternative Approaches to Sensitive Research",

keywords = "social science, methodology, research, sensitive topics, research participants",

author = "S Chan and E Teram and Shaw, {Ian Frank}",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1177/1049732315605272",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "260--270",

journal = "Qualitative Health Research",

issn = "1049-7323",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing methodological rigor and the needs of research participants

T2 - A Debate on Alternative Approaches to Sensitive Research

AU - Chan, S

AU - Teram, E

AU - Shaw, Ian Frank

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

KW - social science

KW - methodology

KW - research

KW - sensitive topics

KW - research participants

U2 - 10.1177/1049732315605272

DO - 10.1177/1049732315605272

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1049-7323

VL - 27

SP - 260

EP - 270

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

IS - 2

ER -