Cell-based therapy for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: an early cost–effectiveness analysis

Andreas Westh Vilsbøll, Jakob Munk Mouritsen, Line Park Jensen, Nikolaj Bødker, Annette Willemoes Holst, Cristian Pablo Pennisi, Lars Holger Ehlers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
310 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: To perform an early cost-effectiveness analysis of in vitro expanded myoblasts (IVM) and minced myofibers versus midurethral slings (MUS) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Methods: Cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analyses were performed using a decision tree comprising previously published data and expert opinions. Results & conclusion: In the base case scenario, MUS was the cost-effective strategy with a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared with IVM and a positive incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared with minced myofibers. However, the sensitivity analysis indicates that IVM may become an alternative providing greater effect at a higher cost. With the possibility of becoming more effective, IVM treatment would be advantageous over MUS given its reduced invasiveness and lower risks of complications.

Translated title of the contributionCellebaseret terapi til behandling af kvindelig stressininkontinens: en tidlig omkostningseffektivitetsanalyse
Original languageEnglish
JournalRegenerative Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)321-330
Number of pages10
ISSN1746-0751
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • cell- and tissue-based therapy
  • economic analysis
  • healthcare costs
  • incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
  • midurethral slings
  • myoblast transplantation
  • stress urinary incontinence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cell-based therapy for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: an early cost–effectiveness analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this