Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions

Robert S Van Howe; Morten Frisch; Peter W Adler; J Steven Svoboda

doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7

Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions

Robert S Van Howe, Morten Frisch, Peter W Adler, J Steven Svoboda

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

201 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2017 Ploug and Holm argued that anonymizing individuals in the Danish circumcision registry was insufficient to protect these individuals from what they regard as the potential harms of being in the registry (overreaching social pressure, stigmatization, medicalization of a religious practice, discrimination and promoting polarized research).

DISCUSSION: We argue that Ploug and Holm's fears in each of the areas are misguided, not supported by the evidence, and could interfere with the gathering of accurate data. The extent of the risks and harms associated with ritual circumcision is not well known. The anonymized personal health data supplemented with the circumcision registry will enable more precise research into the medical consequences of ritual circumcision, and allow parents to make more fully informed decisions about circumcision with minimal, if any, adverse consequences.

Original language	English
Article number	6
Journal	BMC Medical Ethics
Volume	20
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	1-7
Number of pages	7
ISSN	1472-6939
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7
Publication status	Published - 9 Jan 2019

Access to Document

10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7Licence: CC BY 4.0

s12910-018-0337-7Final published version, 556 KBLicence: CC BY 4.0

AUB Link

Search for the material in Aalborg University Library's search engine

Cite this

@article{2c749c0767a3446594f74ec8c405cda5,

title = "Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: In 2017 Ploug and Holm argued that anonymizing individuals in the Danish circumcision registry was insufficient to protect these individuals from what they regard as the potential harms of being in the registry (overreaching social pressure, stigmatization, medicalization of a religious practice, discrimination and promoting polarized research).DISCUSSION: We argue that Ploug and Holm's fears in each of the areas are misguided, not supported by the evidence, and could interfere with the gathering of accurate data. The extent of the risks and harms associated with ritual circumcision is not well known. The anonymized personal health data supplemented with the circumcision registry will enable more precise research into the medical consequences of ritual circumcision, and allow parents to make more fully informed decisions about circumcision with minimal, if any, adverse consequences.",

author = "{Van Howe}, {Robert S} and Morten Frisch and Adler, {Peter W} and Svoboda, {J Steven}",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "9",

doi = "10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "1--7",

journal = "BMC Medical Ethics",

issn = "1472-6939",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions

AU - Van Howe, Robert S

AU - Frisch, Morten

AU - Adler, Peter W

AU - Svoboda, J Steven

PY - 2019/1/9

Y1 - 2019/1/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: In 2017 Ploug and Holm argued that anonymizing individuals in the Danish circumcision registry was insufficient to protect these individuals from what they regard as the potential harms of being in the registry (overreaching social pressure, stigmatization, medicalization of a religious practice, discrimination and promoting polarized research).DISCUSSION: We argue that Ploug and Holm's fears in each of the areas are misguided, not supported by the evidence, and could interfere with the gathering of accurate data. The extent of the risks and harms associated with ritual circumcision is not well known. The anonymized personal health data supplemented with the circumcision registry will enable more precise research into the medical consequences of ritual circumcision, and allow parents to make more fully informed decisions about circumcision with minimal, if any, adverse consequences.

AB - BACKGROUND: In 2017 Ploug and Holm argued that anonymizing individuals in the Danish circumcision registry was insufficient to protect these individuals from what they regard as the potential harms of being in the registry (overreaching social pressure, stigmatization, medicalization of a religious practice, discrimination and promoting polarized research).DISCUSSION: We argue that Ploug and Holm's fears in each of the areas are misguided, not supported by the evidence, and could interfere with the gathering of accurate data. The extent of the risks and harms associated with ritual circumcision is not well known. The anonymized personal health data supplemented with the circumcision registry will enable more precise research into the medical consequences of ritual circumcision, and allow parents to make more fully informed decisions about circumcision with minimal, if any, adverse consequences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059798687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7

DO - 10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30626392

SN - 1472-6939

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMC Medical Ethics

JF - BMC Medical Ethics

IS - 1

M1 - 6

ER -

Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions

Abstract

Access to Document

AUB Link

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this