Commentary: Usability in Theory and Practice

Jan Stage*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary discusses Noam Tractinsky’s article “The Usability Construct: A Dead End?” (Human–Computer Interaction, 2017). That article debates the conceptual qualities of “usability” as a key concept in human–computer interaction. It provides two main conclusions: (a) the usefulness of the concept of “usability” to human–computer interaction theories has been limited and (b) a notion of “construct” is useful for identifying weaknesses of the concept of “usability” and thereby provides reasons for its limited usefulness. The article is interesting and provides an in-depth analysis of the concept of usability. Unfortunately, the use of this analysis is not convincing. Instead, redefinition of “usability” should be based on a constructive approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10.1080/07370024.2017.1333908
JournalHuman-Computer Interaction
Volume33
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)195-197
Number of pages3
ISSN0737-0024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary: Usability in Theory and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this