Comparing heat flow models for interpretation of precast quadratic pile heat exchanger thermal response tests

Maria Alberdi-Pagola*, Søren Erbs Poulsen, Fleur Loveridge, Søren Madsen, Rasmus Lund Jensen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper investigates the applicability of currently available analytical, empirical and numerical heat flow models for interpreting thermal response tests (TRT) of quadratic cross section precast pile heat exchangers. A 3D finite element model (FEM) is utilised for interpreting five TRTs by inverse modelling. The calibrated estimates of soil and concrete thermal conductivity are consistent with independent laboratory measurements. Due to the computational cost of inverting the 3D model, simpler models are utilised in additional calibrations. Interpretations based on semi-empirical pile G-functions yield soil thermal conductivity estimates statistically similar to those obtained from the 3D FEM inverse modelling, given minimum testing times of 60 h. Reliable estimates of pile thermal resistance can only be obtained from type curves computed with 3D FEM models. This study highlights the potential of applying TRTs for sizing quadratic, precast pile heat exchanger foundations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnergy
Volume145
Pages (from-to)721-733
ISSN0360-5442
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Heat flow model
  • Inverse modelling
  • Pile heat exchanger
  • Pile thermal resistance
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Thermal response test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing heat flow models for interpretation of precast quadratic pile heat exchanger thermal response tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this