Fusion cuisine: A functional approach to interdisciplinary cooking in journalism studies

Chris Peters, Marcel Broersma

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
160 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Journalism studies as an academic field is characterized by multidisciplinarity. Focusing on one object of study, journalism and the news, it established itself by integrating and synthesizing approaches from established disciplines – a tendency that lives on today. This constant gaze to the outside for conceptual inspiration and methodological tools lends itself to a journalism studies that is a fusion cuisine of media, communication, and related scholarship. However, what happens when this object becomes as fragmented and multifaceted as the ways we study it? This essay addresses the challenge of multiplicity in journalism studies by introducing an audience-centred, functional approach to scholarship. We argue this approach encourages the creative intellectual advancements afforded by interdisciplinary experimental cooking while respecting the classical intellectual questions that helped define the culinary tradition of journalism studies in the first place. In so doing, we offer a recipe for journalism studies fusion cooking that: (1) considers technological change (audiences’ diets), (2) analyses institutional change (audiences’ supermarket of information), and (3) evaluates journalism’s societal and democratic impact (audiences’ cuisines and health).

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournalism
Volume20
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)660-669
Number of pages10
ISSN1464-8849
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Audience studies
  • news audiences
  • public
  • media technology
  • change
  • journalism studies
  • business models
  • democracy
  • functional approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fusion cuisine: A functional approach to interdisciplinary cooking in journalism studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this