Gender Mainstreaming in the Danish Central Administration: (Mis)Understandings of the Gendered Impact of Law Proposals

Diana Højlund Madsen, Lise Rolandsen Agustin

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Gender mainstreaming is the dominant strategy of the Danish national gender equality efforts. However, gender impact assessments have neither been sufficiently integrated in the policy-making processes of the Danish ministries nor in their organisational cultures, and their impact is minor. Drawing on feminist perspectives on institutional development the article focuses on two case studies – the Ministry of Employment and the Ministry of Transport – with two different practices for doing gender equality assessments. It is important to consider the (lack of) political demand for gender equality assessments in order to understand the (negative) development in terms of their number and content; very few gender equality assessments are produced, and those that are tend to hold little or no transformative potential as they show limited recognition of the gendered consequences of the law proposals.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalKvinder, Køn & Forskning
    Volume26
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)38-49
    Number of pages12
    ISSN0907-6182
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Mainstreaming in the Danish Central Administration: (Mis)Understandings of the Gendered Impact of Law Proposals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this