Analysis of Back-to-Back MMC for Medium Voltage Applications under Faulted Condition

Anurag Bose, Joäo Pedro Rodrigues Martins, Sanjay K. Chaudhary, Remus Teodorescu

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes a 10MW medium voltage Back-to-Back (BTB) Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) without a DC-Link capacitor with halfbridge submodules. It focusses on the system behavior under single-line-to-ground (SLG) fault when there is no capacitor on the DC-Link.The fault current is computed numerically and compared with the simulated results. The converter control behaviour with regards to the injection of the positive sequence currents in the presence of unbalanced terminal voltages has been investigated. Finally, the converter protection using cell level chopper control strategy is presented to prevent DC overvoltages in the sub-modules during faults.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2017
Number of pages6
PublisherIEEE Press
Publication dateOct 2017
Pages858-863
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-5386-1127-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017
Event43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2017 - Beijing, China
Duration: 29 Oct 20171 Nov 2017

Conference

Conference43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2017
Country/TerritoryChina
CityBeijing
Period29/10/201701/11/2017
SponsorChinese Association of Automation (CAA), Chinese Power Supply Society, et al., IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IES), Systems Engineering Society of China, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Keywords

  • MMC
  • Single-line-to-ground fault
  • Tripping conditions
  • Chopper

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of Back-to-Back MMC for Medium Voltage Applications under Faulted Condition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this