Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence

Rune Elvik; Torkel Bjørnskau

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017

Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence

Rune Elvik, Torkel Bjørnskau

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

166 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Highlights
•26 studies of the safety-in-numbers effect are reviewed.
•The existence of a safety-in-numbers effect is confirmed.
•Results are consistent.
•Causes of the safety-in-numbers effect are incompletely known.

Original language	English
Journal	Safety Science
Volume	92
Issue number	February
Pages (from-to)	274–282
ISSN	0925-7535
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017
Publication status	Published - 2017

Bibliographical note

Special Issue Article: Cycling Safety

Keywords

Safety-in-numbers
Meta-analysis
Regression coefficients
Causality

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017

AUB Link

Search for the material in Aalborg University Library's search engine

Cite this

@article{82f25c7ba84f4ac4ac56ed67340e9452,

title = "Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence",

abstract = "Highlights•26 studies of the safety-in-numbers effect are reviewed.•The existence of a safety-in-numbers effect is confirmed.•Results are consistent.•Causes of the safety-in-numbers effect are incompletely known.",

keywords = "Safety-in-numbers, Meta-analysis, Regression coefficients, Causality, Safety-in-numbers, Meta-analysis, Regression coefficients, Causality",

author = "Rune Elvik and Torkel Bj{\o}rnskau",

note = "Special Issue Article: Cycling Safety",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017",

language = "English",

volume = "92",

pages = "274–282",

journal = "Safety Science",

issn = "0925-7535",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "February",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety-in-numbers

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence

AU - Elvik, Rune

AU - Bjørnskau, Torkel

N1 - Special Issue Article: Cycling Safety

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Highlights•26 studies of the safety-in-numbers effect are reviewed.•The existence of a safety-in-numbers effect is confirmed.•Results are consistent.•Causes of the safety-in-numbers effect are incompletely known.

AB - Highlights•26 studies of the safety-in-numbers effect are reviewed.•The existence of a safety-in-numbers effect is confirmed.•Results are consistent.•Causes of the safety-in-numbers effect are incompletely known.

KW - Safety-in-numbers

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Regression coefficients

KW - Causality

KW - Safety-in-numbers

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Regression coefficients

KW - Causality

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0925-7535

VL - 92

SP - 274

EP - 282

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

IS - February

ER -

Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

AUB Link

Fingerprint

Cite this