Preliminary evaluation of sweet spot size in virtual sound reproduction using dipoles

Yesenia Lacouture Parodi, Per Rubak

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a previous study, three crosstalk cancellation techniques were evaluated and compared under different conditions. Least square approximations in frequency and time domain were evaluated along with a method based on minimum-phase approximation and a frequency independent delay. In general, the least square methods outperformed the method based on minimum-phase approximation. However, the evaluation was only done for the best-case scenario, where the transfer functions used to design the filters correspond to the listener's transfer functions and his/her location and orientation relative to the loudspeakers. In this paper we present a follow up evaluation of the performance of the three inversion techniques when these conditions are violated. A setup to measure the sweet spot of different loudspeakers arrangements is described. Preliminary measurement results are presented for loudspeakers placed at the horizontal plane and an elevated position, where a typical 60 degrees stereo setup is compared with two closely spaced loudspeaker. Additionally, two- and four-channels arrangements are evaluated.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAudio Engineering Society Convention Papers : Papers 7651-7819
Number of pages13
PublisherAudio Engineering Society
Publication date2009
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-937803-67-7
Publication statusPublished - 2009
EventAES 126th Convention - Munich, Germany
Duration: 7 May 200910 May 2009
Conference number: 126

Conference

ConferenceAES 126th Convention
Number126
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityMunich
Period07/05/200910/05/2009

Bibliographical note

Paper no. 7723

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preliminary evaluation of sweet spot size in virtual sound reproduction using dipoles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this