Abstract
Preparing students for a life as active citizens in a democratic society is one of the aims within the Bologna process. The Council of Europe has also stressed the importance of focus on democracy in Higher Education. Higher Education is seen as important to develop a democratic culture among students. Teaching democracy should be promoted in lessons and curricula.
Creating democratic learning systems in institutions of higher education could be the answer to reaching the aim related to democracy.
The Aalborg Model practised at Aalborg University is a learning system which has collaborative democratic elements built into the model.
This paper brings results from an online quantitative, questionnaire survey between nearly 200 engineering and science students in their second semester at Aalborg University.
The main findings are: Nearly 85 percent of the respondent’s state that their group uses discussions quite often or always to reach technical decisions. And a little more than 85 percent say that they use discussions to reach decisions related to project management. Almost 60 percent of the respondents state that the group is participant controlled quite often or always. Less than 4 percent are of the opinion that the group is controlled by the facilitator (quite often/always). 90 percent of the respondents are of the opinion that their group is democratic, 3 percent that it is elitist.
Creating democratic learning systems in institutions of higher education could be the answer to reaching the aim related to democracy.
The Aalborg Model practised at Aalborg University is a learning system which has collaborative democratic elements built into the model.
This paper brings results from an online quantitative, questionnaire survey between nearly 200 engineering and science students in their second semester at Aalborg University.
The main findings are: Nearly 85 percent of the respondent’s state that their group uses discussions quite often or always to reach technical decisions. And a little more than 85 percent say that they use discussions to reach decisions related to project management. Almost 60 percent of the respondents state that the group is participant controlled quite often or always. Less than 4 percent are of the opinion that the group is controlled by the facilitator (quite often/always). 90 percent of the respondents are of the opinion that their group is democratic, 3 percent that it is elitist.
| Translated title of the contribution | Aalborg Modellen og deltagerstyret læring |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Journal | Problems of Education in the 21st Century |
| Volume | 18 |
| Pages (from-to) | 138-150 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 1822-7864 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |