Observer and Data-Driven-Model-Based Fault Detection in Power Plant Coal Mills

Peter Fogh Odgaard, B. Lin, S. B. Jørgensen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents and compares model-based and data-driven fault detection approaches for coal mill systems. The first approach detects faults with an optimal unknown input observer developed from a simplified energy balance model. Due to the time-consuming effort in developing a first principles model with motor power as the controlled variable, data-driven methods for fault detection are also investigated. Regression models that represent normal operating conditions (NOCs) are developed with both static and dynamic principal component analysis and partial
 least squaresmethods. The residual between processmeasurement and the NOC model prediction is used for fault detection. A hybrid approach, where a data-drivenmodel is employed to derive an optimal unknown input observer, is also implemented. The three methods are evaluated with case studies on coal mill data, which includes a fault caused
 by a blocked inlet pipe.All three approaches detect the fault as it emerges. The optimal unknown input observer approach is most robust, in that, it has no false positives. On the other hand, the data-driven approaches are more straightforward to implement, since they just require the selection of appropriate confidence limit to avoid false
 detection. The proposed hybrid approach is promising for systems where a first principles model is cumbersome to obtain.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion
Volume23
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)659-668
Number of pages10
ISSN0885-8969
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Fault Detection
  • Data-driven Detection
  • Power plants
  • Unknown input observer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observer and Data-Driven-Model-Based Fault Detection in Power Plant Coal Mills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this