If PBL is the answer, then what is the problem?

Hans Huttel, Dorina Gnaur

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper identifies and analyzes problems with routinization of
project work in PBL-based degree programmes and points towards
possible solutions. The paper uses a survey of students’ and
supervisor’s perceptions of project work in the context of attempts to
emphasize problem-based aspects of project work in the undergraduate
degree programme in computer science at Aalborg University. Danish
PBL-based higher education institutions espouse the qualities of
problembased projects but actual practice shows a different
picture. The predominant use of project catalogues and the formal
requirements imposed by accreditation inhibit central intentions
behind problem-based project work. The study reported on is limited to
a specific degree programme and to a particular approach to dealing
with the problem of routinization. The findings in this paper point
towards the need for action research into new ways of structuring
problem-based project work in different settings. We identify the need
for a further discussion of the conflict between the espoused ideals
of PBL and the actual practice at PBL-based higher education. In
particular, much greater attention should be devoted to the practice
of semester coordination. This paper gives a critical analysis of the
practice in PBL-based higher education and should be of value to
practitioners and decision makers in these settings.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education
Volume5
Issue number2
Number of pages21
ISSN2246-0918
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017
EventCHER 28th Annual Conference - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 7 Sept 20159 Sept 2015

Conference

ConferenceCHER 28th Annual Conference
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period07/09/201509/09/2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'If PBL is the answer, then what is the problem?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this