Landscape relatedness: detecting contemporary fine-scale spatial structure in wild populations

Anita J Norman, Astrid Vik Strønen, Geir-Arne Fuglstad, Aritz Ruiz-Gonzalez, Jonas Kindberg, Nathaniel R. Street, Göran Spong

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
213 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context
Methods for detecting contemporary, fine-scale population genetic structure in continuous populations are scarce. Yet such methods are vital for ecological and conservation studies, particularly under a changing landscape.

Objectives
Here we present a novel, spatially explicit method that we call landscape relatedness (LandRel). With this method, we aim to detect contemporary, fine-scale population structure that is sensitive to spatial and temporal changes in the landscape.

Methods
We interpolate spatially determined relatedness values based on SNP genotypes across the landscape. Interpolations are calculated using the Bayesian inference approach integrated nested Laplace approximation. We empirically tested this method on a continuous population of brown bears (Ursus arctos) spanning two counties in Sweden.

Results
Two areas were identified as differentiated from the remaining population. Further analysis suggests that inbreeding has occurred in at least one of these areas.

Conclusions
LandRel enabled us to identify previously unknown fine-scale structuring in the population. These results will help direct future research efforts, conservation action and aid in the management of the Scandinavian brown bear population. LandRel thus offers an approach for detecting subtle population structure with a focus on contemporary, fine-scale analysis of continuous populations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume32
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)181-194
Number of pages14
ISSN0921-2973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Landscape relatedness: detecting contemporary fine-scale spatial structure in wild populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this