Making Good Citizens from Bad Life in Post-Genocide Rwanda

Simon Turner*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This contribution explores the attempts by international humanitarian agencies and the post-genocide Rwandan state respectively to deal with exceptionality created by the genocide and return to normality. It does so by comparing two kinds of camps that deal with exceptional life: the refugee camps for Hutu who fled after the genocide and the Rwandan government's ingando re-education camps. While there are resemblances between the exceptional space of refugee camps and the ingando camps, there are also subtle differences. While the international community is attempting to create universal citizens out of 'bare life', the Rwandan state is attempting to create good citizens by exorcizing a concrete historical moment of violence; the Hutu who enter the ingando are perceived as what I term 'bad life'. In this sense, the Rwandan state's concept of a new beginning differs from universalist claims to transitional justice in that it is specific, political and at times violent. Creating a new Rwanda is a political project which involves casting the country in a specific image. Chapters

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationTransition and Justice : Negotiating the Terms of New Beginnings in Africa
    Number of pages19
    PublisherWiley-Blackwell
    Publication date3 Dec 2014
    Pages21-39
    ISBN (Print)9781118944745, 9781118944776
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Making Good Citizens from Bad Life in Post-Genocide Rwanda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this