Monocausalism versus systems approach to development: The possibility of natural resource-based development

Allan Dahl Andersen, Bjørn Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Development economics has over the years produced several one-factor explanations that we term as "fundamentalisms". The authors argue that these fundamentalisms are interdependent and complement each other, and hence, the process of economic development must be understood as systemic. The focus is on "production-structure fundamentalism" in the form of the resource curse. By use of empirical examples it is argued that resource-based development is possible by building institutions supporting development of new knowledge and competences. The paper concludes that rather than individual development factors, it is the by institutions sustained interdependency and interaction between different types of development factors that underlie development processes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInstitutions and Economies
Volume6
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)27-54
Number of pages28
ISSN2232-1640
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monocausalism versus systems approach to development: The possibility of natural resource-based development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this