Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping

Marko Markovic, Meike A. Schweisfurth, Leonard F. Engels, Dario Farina, Strahinja Dosen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)
265 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensory feedback is critical for grasping in able-bodied subjects. Consequently, closing the loop in upper-limb prosthetics by providing artificial sensory feedback to the amputee is expected to improve the prosthesis utility. Nevertheless, even though amputees rate the prospect of sensory feedback high, its benefits in daily life are still very much debated. We argue that in order to measure the potential functional benefit of artificial sensory feedback, the baseline open-loop performance needs to be established.

METHODS: The myoelectric control of naïve able-bodied subjects was evaluated during modulation of electromyographic signals (EMG task), and grasping with a prosthesis (Prosthesis task). The subjects needed to activate the wrist flexor muscles and close the prosthesis to reach a randomly selected target level (routine grasping). To assess the baseline performance, the tasks were performed with a different extent of implicit feedback (proprioception, prosthesis motion and sound). Finally, the prosthesis task was repeated with explicit visual force feedback. The subjects' ability to scale the prosthesis command/force was assessed by testing for a statistically significant increase in the median of the generated commands/forces between neighboring levels. The quality of control was evaluated by computing the median absolute error (MAE) with respect to the target.

RESULTS: The subjects could successfully scale their motor commands and generated prosthesis forces across target levels in all tasks, even with the least amount of implicit feedback (only muscle proprioception, EMG task). In addition, the deviation of the generated commands/forces from the target levels decreased with additional feedback. However, the increase in implicit feedback, from proprioception to prosthesis motion and sound, seemed to have a more substantial effect than the final introduction of explicit feedback. Explicit feedback improved the performance mainly at the higher target-force levels.

CONCLUSIONS: The study establishes the baseline performance of myoelectric control and prosthesis grasping force. The results demonstrate that even without additional feedback, naïve subjects can effectively modulate force with good accuracy with respect to that achieved when increasing the amount of feedback information.

Original languageEnglish
Article number81
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number1
Number of pages11
ISSN1743-0003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2018

Keywords

  • Baseline
  • Closed-loop control
  • Grasping force
  • Myoelectric prosthesis
  • Routine grasping
  • Sensory feedback

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this