On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models
Publication: Research - peer-review › Review article
Standard
On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models. / Lund, Morten Enemark; de Zee, Mark; Andersen, Michael Skipper; Rasmussen, John.
In: Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Vol. 226, No. 2, 2012, p. 82-94.Publication: Research - peer-review › Review article
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models
A1 - Lund,Morten Enemark
A1 - de Zee,Mark
A1 - Andersen,Michael Skipper
A1 - Rasmussen,John
AU - Lund,Morten Enemark
AU - de Zee,Mark
AU - Andersen,Michael Skipper
AU - Rasmussen,John
PB - Sage Publications Ltd.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This paper reviews the opportunities to validate multibody musculoskeletal models in view of the current transition of musculoskeletal modelling from a research topic to a practical simulation tool in product design, healthcare and other important applications. This transition creates a new need for justification that the models are adequate representations of the systems they simulate.<br/>The need for a consistent terminology and established standards is identified and knowledge from fields with a more progressed state-of-the-art in Verification and Validation is introduced.<br/>A number of practical steps for improvement of the validation of multibody musculoskeletal models are pointed out and directions for future research in the field are proposed. It is our hope that a more structured approach to model validation can help to improve the credibility of musculoskeletal models.<br/>
AB - This paper reviews the opportunities to validate multibody musculoskeletal models in view of the current transition of musculoskeletal modelling from a research topic to a practical simulation tool in product design, healthcare and other important applications. This transition creates a new need for justification that the models are adequate representations of the systems they simulate.<br/>The need for a consistent terminology and established standards is identified and knowledge from fields with a more progressed state-of-the-art in Verification and Validation is introduced.<br/>A number of practical steps for improvement of the validation of multibody musculoskeletal models are pointed out and directions for future research in the field are proposed. It is our hope that a more structured approach to model validation can help to improve the credibility of musculoskeletal models.<br/>
U2 - 10.1177/0954411911431516
DO - 10.1177/0954411911431516
JO - Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
JF - Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
SN - 0954-4119
IS - 2
VL - 226
SP - 82
EP - 94
ER -