On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models

Publication: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Standard

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1ca3e50d90394b38aeae4dc71b9b96c0,
title = "On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
author = "Lund, {Morten Enemark} and {de Zee}, Mark and Andersen, {Michael Skipper} and John Rasmussen",
year = "2012",
volume = "226",
number = "2",
pages = "82--94",
journal = "Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine",
issn = "0954-4119",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models

A1 - Lund,Morten Enemark

A1 - de Zee,Mark

A1 - Andersen,Michael Skipper

A1 - Rasmussen,John

AU - Lund,Morten Enemark

AU - de Zee,Mark

AU - Andersen,Michael Skipper

AU - Rasmussen,John

PB - Sage Publications Ltd.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper reviews the opportunities to validate multibody musculoskeletal models in view of the current transition of musculoskeletal modelling from a research topic to a practical simulation tool in product design, healthcare and other important applications. This transition creates a new need for justification that the models are adequate representations of the systems they simulate.<br/>The need for a consistent terminology and established standards is identified and knowledge from fields with a more progressed state-of-the-art in Verification and Validation is introduced.<br/>A number of practical steps for improvement of the validation of multibody musculoskeletal models are pointed out and directions for future research in the field are proposed. It is our hope that a more structured approach to model validation can help to improve the credibility of musculoskeletal models.<br/>

AB - This paper reviews the opportunities to validate multibody musculoskeletal models in view of the current transition of musculoskeletal modelling from a research topic to a practical simulation tool in product design, healthcare and other important applications. This transition creates a new need for justification that the models are adequate representations of the systems they simulate.<br/>The need for a consistent terminology and established standards is identified and knowledge from fields with a more progressed state-of-the-art in Verification and Validation is introduced.<br/>A number of practical steps for improvement of the validation of multibody musculoskeletal models are pointed out and directions for future research in the field are proposed. It is our hope that a more structured approach to model validation can help to improve the credibility of musculoskeletal models.<br/>

U2 - 10.1177/0954411911431516

DO - 10.1177/0954411911431516

JO - Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

JF - Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

SN - 0954-4119

IS - 2

VL - 226

SP - 82

EP - 94

ER -