'Presencing' and 'Absencing': A Deconstruction of US-based Public Relations Textbooks

    Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter describes how US-based public relations (PR) textbooks enter a pact with the devil. It outlines their failed aspiration to create the eternal moment of a utopic PR, while ignoring the ‘passing bell.’ The textbooks paint a picture of professional practitioners who contribute to the ‘effectiveness’ of organisations, while being truthful and engaged in symmetric communication. Research on social psychology and management textbooks point in a similar direction. M. Billig argues ‘that social psychology textbooks typically fulfil a conservative function by training students to accept the dominant assumptions of the discipline’. The theoretical interplay of differance and deconstruction facilitates the development of a research design that is sensitive to the constitutive and legitimizing power of textbook communication, while concurrently revealing its vulnerability. The analysis of presencing strategies confirms what critical studies have already established about one-sided and hegemonic reality constructions in textbooks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPublic Relations, Society and the Generative Power of History
    EditorsIan Somerville, Lee Edwards, Øyvind Ihlen
    Number of pages14
    Place of PublicationAbingdon
    PublisherRoutledge
    Publication date4 Sept 2019
    Edition1
    Pages30-44
    Chapter2
    ISBN (Print)9781138317109, 9781138317116
    ISBN (Electronic)9780429451287
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Sept 2019

    Keywords

    • US-based public relations textbooks
    • public relations
    • textbook communication
    • presencing strategies
    • deconstruction
    • USA

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Presencing' and 'Absencing': A Deconstruction of US-based Public Relations Textbooks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this