The State of the Art Ten Years After a State of the Art: Future Research in Music Information Retrieval

Bob L. Sturm

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)
2044 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A decade has passed since
the first review of research on a ``flagship application" of music information retrieval (MIR):
the problem of music genre recognition (MGR).
During this time, about 500 works addressing MGR have been published,
and at least 10 campaigns have been run to evaluate MGR systems,
which makes MGR one of the most researched areas of MIR.
So, where does MGR lie now?
We show that in spite of this massive amount of work,
MGR does not lie far from where it began,
and the paramount reason for this is that
most evaluation in MGR lacks validity.
We perform a case study of all published research
using the most-used benchmark dataset in MGR
during the past decade: {\em GTZAN}.
We show that none of the evaluations in these many works
is valid to produce conclusions with respect to {\em recognizing genre},
i.e., that a system is using criteria relevant to recognize genre.
In fact, the problems of validity in evaluation also affect
research in music emotion recognition and autotagging.
We conclude by discussing the implications of our work
for MGR and MIR in the next ten years.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of New Music Research
Volume43
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)147-172
ISSN0929-8215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The State of the Art Ten Years After a State of the Art: Future Research in Music Information Retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this