When 'exact recovery' is exact recovery in compressed sensing simulation

Bob L. Sturm

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article in JournalResearchpeer-review

335 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In a simulation of compressed sensing (CS), one must test whether the recovered solution \(\vax\) is the true solution \(\vx\), i.e., ``exact recovery.''
Most CS simulations employ one of two criteria: 1) the recovered support is the true support; or 2) the normalized squared error is less than \(\epsilon^2\). We analyze these exact recovery criteria independent of any recovery algorithm, but with respect to signal distributions that are often used in CS simulations. That is, given a pair \((\vax,\vx)\), when does ``exact recovery'' occur with respect to only one or both of these criteria for a given distribution of \(\vx\)? We show that, in a best case scenario, \(\epsilon^2\) sets a maximum allowed missed detection rate
in a majority sense.
Original languageEnglish
JournalProceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference
Volume2012
Pages (from-to)979-983
Number of pages5
ISSN2076-1465
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventEUSIPCO2012 - Bucharest, Romania
Duration: 27 Aug 2012 → …

Conference

ConferenceEUSIPCO2012
Country/TerritoryRomania
CityBucharest
Period27/08/2012 → …

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When 'exact recovery' is exact recovery in compressed sensing simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this