Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

Fionn Büttner; Marinus Winters; Eamonn Delahunt; Roy Elbers; Carolina B Lura; Karim M Khan; Adam Weir; Clare L Ardern

doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806

Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

Fionn Büttner, Marinus Winters, Eamonn Delahunt, Roy Elbers, Carolina B Lura, Karim M Khan, Adam Weir, Clare L Ardern

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

24 Citationer (Scopus)

59 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this editorial, we introduced risk of bias as the perceived risk that the results of a research study may underestimate or overestimate the truth. Systematic review authors should perform a domain-based risk of bias assessment that reflects risk of bias instead of assessing study quality. If a research study reports multiple outcome measures, separate risk of bias assessments should be performed for each outcome measure.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	British Journal of Sports Medicine
Vol/bind	54
Udgave nummer	13
Sider (fra-til)	798-800
Antal sider	3
ISSN	0306-3674
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806
Status	Udgivet - 2020

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806

Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1 : assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviewsAccepteret manuskript, 90,3 KBLicens: CC BY-NC 4.0

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Andre filer og links

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076993101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Citationsformater

@article{0c407fc7f87a427aa07df0f4ecffb602,

title = "Identifying the {\textquoteleft}incredible{\textquoteright}! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews",

abstract = "In this editorial, we introduced risk of bias as the perceived risk that the results of a research study may underestimate or overestimate the truth. Systematic review authors should perform a domain-based risk of bias assessment that reflects risk of bias instead of assessing study quality. If a research study reports multiple outcome measures, separate risk of bias assessments should be performed for each outcome measure.",

keywords = "methodological, review, meta-analysis, education",

author = "Fionn B{\"u}ttner and Marinus Winters and Eamonn Delahunt and Roy Elbers and Lura, {Carolina B} and Khan, {Karim M} and Adam Weir and Ardern, {Clare L}",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "798--800",

journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",

issn = "0306-3674",

publisher = "B M J Group",

number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1

T2 - assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

AU - Büttner, Fionn

AU - Winters, Marinus

AU - Delahunt, Eamonn

AU - Elbers, Roy

AU - Lura, Carolina B

AU - Khan, Karim M

AU - Weir, Adam

AU - Ardern, Clare L

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In this editorial, we introduced risk of bias as the perceived risk that the results of a research study may underestimate or overestimate the truth. Systematic review authors should perform a domain-based risk of bias assessment that reflects risk of bias instead of assessing study quality. If a research study reports multiple outcome measures, separate risk of bias assessments should be performed for each outcome measure.

AB - In this editorial, we introduced risk of bias as the perceived risk that the results of a research study may underestimate or overestimate the truth. Systematic review authors should perform a domain-based risk of bias assessment that reflects risk of bias instead of assessing study quality. If a research study reports multiple outcome measures, separate risk of bias assessments should be performed for each outcome measure.

KW - methodological

KW - review

KW - meta-analysis

KW - education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076993101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0306-3674

VL - 54

SP - 798

EP - 800

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

IS - 13

ER -

Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

AUB Link

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater