A Case of Greenlandic Fisheries Co-Politics: Power and Participation in Total Allowable Catch Policy-Making

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

10 Citationer (Scopus)

Resumé

Greenlandic governance institutions have been criticised for their colonial heritage of centralisation and lack of democratic participation. In the same manner, Greenlandic fisheries management is notorious in the academic literature for its centralised and locally illegitimate character. While recognising the lack of localised co-management fisheries governance institutions in Greenland, we argue that something has yet to be said about power and user participation in the centralised institutions that have developed. From a symbolic interactionist perspective we dissect the centralised institutions in terms of a differentiated cast of actors and their interaction and argue that participation and power come in many institutional guises as the complex cast of actors within the centralised system represent themselves and others. If we are to understand power and participation in Greenlandic fisheries governance, we need to understand the creation of alliances of the subject-positions that seek control of the self-rule fisheries governance decision-making.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHuman Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)175-184
Antal sider10
ISSN0300-7839
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2012

Citer dette

@article{cc9435dac5f04cb9a552cc821a103a03,
title = "A Case of Greenlandic Fisheries Co-Politics: Power and Participation in Total Allowable Catch Policy-Making",
abstract = "Greenlandic governance institutions have been criticised for their colonial heritage of centralisation and lack of democratic participation. In the same manner, Greenlandic fisheries management is notorious in the academic literature for its centralised and locally illegitimate character. While recognising the lack of localised co-management fisheries governance institutions in Greenland, we argue that something has yet to be said about power and user participation in the centralised institutions that have developed. From a symbolic interactionist perspective we dissect the centralised institutions in terms of a differentiated cast of actors and their interaction and argue that participation and power come in many institutional guises as the complex cast of actors within the centralised system represent themselves and others. If we are to understand power and participation in Greenlandic fisheries governance, we need to understand the creation of alliances of the subject-positions that seek control of the self-rule fisheries governance decision-making.",
author = "Jacobsen, {Rikke Becker} and Jesper Raakj{\ae}r",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10745-012-9458-7",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "175--184",
journal = "Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal",
issn = "0300-7839",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

A Case of Greenlandic Fisheries Co-Politics : Power and Participation in Total Allowable Catch Policy-Making. / Jacobsen, Rikke Becker; Raakjær, Jesper.

I: Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Bind 40, Nr. 2, 04.2012, s. 175-184.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Case of Greenlandic Fisheries Co-Politics

T2 - Power and Participation in Total Allowable Catch Policy-Making

AU - Jacobsen, Rikke Becker

AU - Raakjær, Jesper

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Greenlandic governance institutions have been criticised for their colonial heritage of centralisation and lack of democratic participation. In the same manner, Greenlandic fisheries management is notorious in the academic literature for its centralised and locally illegitimate character. While recognising the lack of localised co-management fisheries governance institutions in Greenland, we argue that something has yet to be said about power and user participation in the centralised institutions that have developed. From a symbolic interactionist perspective we dissect the centralised institutions in terms of a differentiated cast of actors and their interaction and argue that participation and power come in many institutional guises as the complex cast of actors within the centralised system represent themselves and others. If we are to understand power and participation in Greenlandic fisheries governance, we need to understand the creation of alliances of the subject-positions that seek control of the self-rule fisheries governance decision-making.

AB - Greenlandic governance institutions have been criticised for their colonial heritage of centralisation and lack of democratic participation. In the same manner, Greenlandic fisheries management is notorious in the academic literature for its centralised and locally illegitimate character. While recognising the lack of localised co-management fisheries governance institutions in Greenland, we argue that something has yet to be said about power and user participation in the centralised institutions that have developed. From a symbolic interactionist perspective we dissect the centralised institutions in terms of a differentiated cast of actors and their interaction and argue that participation and power come in many institutional guises as the complex cast of actors within the centralised system represent themselves and others. If we are to understand power and participation in Greenlandic fisheries governance, we need to understand the creation of alliances of the subject-positions that seek control of the self-rule fisheries governance decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859754286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10745-012-9458-7

DO - 10.1007/s10745-012-9458-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 175

EP - 184

JO - Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal

JF - Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal

SN - 0300-7839

IS - 2

ER -