A comparison of interactive and ad-hoc relevance assessments

Birger Larsen*, Saadia Malik, Anastasios Tombros

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

7 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we report an initial comparison of relevance assessments made as part of the INEX 2006 Interactive Track (itrack'06) to those made for the topic assessment phase of the INEX 2007 ad-hoc track. The results indicate that that there are important differences in what information was assessed under the two different conditions, but it also suggests a certain level of agreement in what constitutes relevant and non-relevant information. In addition, there are indications that the task type has an influence on the distribution of relevance assessments.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelFocused Access to XML Documents - 6th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2007, Revised and Selected Papers
Antal sider11
Publikationsdato22 sep. 2008
Sider348-358
ISBN (Trykt)3540859012, 9783540859017
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 22 sep. 2008
Begivenhed6th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2007 - Dagstuhl Castle, Tyskland
Varighed: 17 dec. 200719 dec. 2007

Konference

Konference6th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2007
Land/OmrådeTyskland
ByDagstuhl Castle
Periode17/12/200719/12/2007
NavnLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Vol/bind4862 LNCS
ISSN0302-9743

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'A comparison of interactive and ad-hoc relevance assessments'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater