A Grammar of Praxis: an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Taking departure in the author’s recent book “A New Logical Foundation for Psychology” the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man’s embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author’s abovementioned book.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (IPBS)
Vol/bind53
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)223-237
ISSN1932-4502
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 jun. 2019

Fingerprint

Formal logic
grammar
Repair
psychology
Psychology
psyche
human sciences
grief
natural sciences
logic
language
Renaissance
love
Language
mathematics
Natural Science Disciplines
Grief
cause
human being
Love

Citer dette

@article{d157ee5e67974e41831640659fd6f9d1,
title = "A Grammar of Praxis: an Expos{\'e} of {"}A New Logical Foundation for Psychology{"}, a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov",
abstract = "Taking departure in the author’s recent book “A New Logical Foundation for Psychology” the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man’s embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author’s abovementioned book.",
keywords = "Affection, Axiom of choice, Axiomatic method, Cognition, Dualism, General psychology, Mathematical logic, Mechanicism, Sense categories and choice categories, Theory of sets, Topology",
author = "Jens Mammen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "223--237",
journal = "Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science",
issn = "1932-4502",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Grammar of Praxis

T2 - an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov

AU - Mammen, Jens

PY - 2019/6/9

Y1 - 2019/6/9

N2 - Taking departure in the author’s recent book “A New Logical Foundation for Psychology” the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man’s embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author’s abovementioned book.

AB - Taking departure in the author’s recent book “A New Logical Foundation for Psychology” the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man’s embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author’s abovementioned book.

KW - Affection

KW - Axiom of choice

KW - Axiomatic method

KW - Cognition

KW - Dualism

KW - General psychology

KW - Mathematical logic

KW - Mechanicism

KW - Sense categories and choice categories

KW - Theory of sets

KW - Topology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063199760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2

DO - 10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 223

EP - 237

JO - Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science

JF - Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science

SN - 1932-4502

IS - 2

ER -