TY - JOUR
T1 - A proof of concept study, demonstrating extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal using hemodialysis with a low bicarbonate dialysate
AU - Cove, M.E.
AU - Vu, L.H.
AU - Ring, T.
AU - May, A.G.
AU - Federspiel, W.J.
AU - Kellum, J.A.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO
2R) devices remove CO
2 directly from blood, facilitating ultraprotective ventilation or even providing an alternative to mechanical ventilation. However, ECCO
2R is not widely available, whereas dialysis is available in most intensive care units (ICUs). Prior attempts to provide ECCO
2R with dialysis, by removing CO
2 in the form of bicarbonate, have been plagued by metabolic acidosis. We hypothesized that bicarbonate dialysis is feasible, provided the plasma strong ion difference is maintained. We used a mathematical model to investigate the effects of bicarbonate removal on pH and CO
2 in plasma, and performed in-vitro experiments to test CO
2 removal using three dialysates with different bicarbonate concentrations (0, 16, and 32 mmol·L
-1). Our modeling predicted a reduction in partial pressures of CO
2 (PCO
2) and increased pH with progressive lowering of plasma bicarbonate, provided strong ion difference and plasma proteins (A
tot) were maintained. In our in-vitro experiments, total CO
2 removal, scaled up to an adult size filter, was highest with our dialysate containing no bicarbonate, where we removed the equivalent of 94 ml·min
-1 (±3.0) of CO
2. Under the same conditions, our dialysate containing a conventional bicarbonate concentration (32 mmol·L
-1) only removed 5 ml·min
-1 (±4; p < 0.001). As predicted, pH increased following bicarbonate removal. Our data show that dialysis using low bicarbonate dialysates is feasible and results in a reduction in plasma PCO
2. When scaled up, to estimate equivalent CO
2 removal with an adult dialysis circuit, the amount removed competes with existing low-flow ECCO
2R devices.
AB - Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO
2R) devices remove CO
2 directly from blood, facilitating ultraprotective ventilation or even providing an alternative to mechanical ventilation. However, ECCO
2R is not widely available, whereas dialysis is available in most intensive care units (ICUs). Prior attempts to provide ECCO
2R with dialysis, by removing CO
2 in the form of bicarbonate, have been plagued by metabolic acidosis. We hypothesized that bicarbonate dialysis is feasible, provided the plasma strong ion difference is maintained. We used a mathematical model to investigate the effects of bicarbonate removal on pH and CO
2 in plasma, and performed in-vitro experiments to test CO
2 removal using three dialysates with different bicarbonate concentrations (0, 16, and 32 mmol·L
-1). Our modeling predicted a reduction in partial pressures of CO
2 (PCO
2) and increased pH with progressive lowering of plasma bicarbonate, provided strong ion difference and plasma proteins (A
tot) were maintained. In our in-vitro experiments, total CO
2 removal, scaled up to an adult size filter, was highest with our dialysate containing no bicarbonate, where we removed the equivalent of 94 ml·min
-1 (±3.0) of CO
2. Under the same conditions, our dialysate containing a conventional bicarbonate concentration (32 mmol·L
-1) only removed 5 ml·min
-1 (±4; p < 0.001). As predicted, pH increased following bicarbonate removal. Our data show that dialysis using low bicarbonate dialysates is feasible and results in a reduction in plasma PCO
2. When scaled up, to estimate equivalent CO
2 removal with an adult dialysis circuit, the amount removed competes with existing low-flow ECCO
2R devices.
KW - Dialysis
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Ventilation
KW - artificial
KW - Carbon dioxide removal
KW - CO2 removal
KW - Mechanical ventilation
KW - Metabolic acidosis
KW - Plasma protein
KW - Proof of concept
KW - respiration
KW - Carbon dioxide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075147026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000879
DO - 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000879
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1058-2916
VL - 65
SP - 605
EP - 613
JO - ASAIO Journal
JF - ASAIO Journal
IS - 6
ER -