TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
AU - Rasmussen, Louise Skau
AU - Winther, Stine B.
AU - M. Chen, Inna
AU - Weber, Britta
AU - Ventzel, Lise
AU - Liposits, Gabor
AU - Johansen, Julia Sidenius
AU - Detlefsen, Sönke
AU - Egendal, Ida
AU - Shim, Susy
AU - Christensen, Signe
AU - Pfeiffer, Per
AU - Ladekarl, Morten
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).
PY - 2023/6/16
Y1 - 2023/6/16
N2 - Background: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. Methods: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. Discussion: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023.
AB - Background: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. Methods: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. Discussion: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023.
KW - Albumins
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
KW - Deoxycytidine
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Humans
KW - Paclitaxel
KW - Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Toxicity
KW - Chemotherapy dose
KW - Quality of life
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - Frail
KW - Older patients
KW - Randomized study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162028720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6
DO - 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37328835
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 23
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 552
ER -