TY - JOUR
T1 - A retrospective cohort study on oesophageal food bolus obstruction in the North Denmark region in 2021-two thirds were never diagnosed with a cause
AU - Terkelsen, Jacob Holmen
AU - Hollænder, Martin
AU - Bredal, Kasper
AU - Nielsen, Sara Munk
AU - Thomsen, Kristoffer Vittrup Koed
AU - Baggerman, Amanda
AU - Ofverlind, Emilia
AU - Koc, Alptug Mertcan
AU - Pakes, Hannah
AU - Mahdi, Marco Bassam
AU - Larsen, Sanne Ørnfeldt
AU - Gonzalez, Vanessa Parra
AU - Riis, Johannes
AU - Frandsen, Line Tegtmeier
AU - Melgaard, Dorte
AU - Krarup, Anne Lund
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).
PY - 2024/1/2
Y1 - 2024/1/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: Food bolus obstruction (FBO) leading to hospital treatment is often associated with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), stenosis, or oesophageal cancer (1). Danish national guidelines recommend that patients with FBO undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy within two weeks of presentation to exclude possible malignancy, and histological evaluation of eight biopsies (2, 3).AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) report the incidence and describe the causes and treatment of FBO in the North Denmark Region (NDR), (2) determine the proportion of patients who underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy according to regional and national guidelines, and (3) identify International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes applied to the hospital visits due to FBO in the NDR.METHODS: Among all acute hospital visits in the NDR in 2021, all visits with ICD-10 codes possibly reflecting FBO, as well as a random sample of 14,400 visits with unspecific ICD-10 codes (R and Z codes), were screened manually for possible FBO. Diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of all patients with FBO were recorded.RESULTS: The median patient age was 66.0 (Q1-Q3: 49.8-81.0) years, and half of the patients had experienced FBO before. Two thirds of patients (66.0%) were never diagnosed with a cause of FBO, followed by 17.3% with EoE. 30% of patients did not undergo upper endoscopy within two weeks of the hospital visit, and 50.7% were never biopsied in the oesophagus. Of 1886 hospital visits with registry ICD-10 codes that possibly reflected FBO, 8.4% were due to FBO, while FBO was present in 0.028% of the random sample of unspecific ICD-10 codes.CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalized FBO patients in the NDR in 2021 were never diagnosed with a cause. In these patients there is a high risk of overlooked EoE or upper gastrointestinal cancers. The area needs immediate focus and changed routines to improve treatment and prevent new FBO.
AB - BACKGROUND: Food bolus obstruction (FBO) leading to hospital treatment is often associated with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), stenosis, or oesophageal cancer (1). Danish national guidelines recommend that patients with FBO undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy within two weeks of presentation to exclude possible malignancy, and histological evaluation of eight biopsies (2, 3).AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) report the incidence and describe the causes and treatment of FBO in the North Denmark Region (NDR), (2) determine the proportion of patients who underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy according to regional and national guidelines, and (3) identify International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes applied to the hospital visits due to FBO in the NDR.METHODS: Among all acute hospital visits in the NDR in 2021, all visits with ICD-10 codes possibly reflecting FBO, as well as a random sample of 14,400 visits with unspecific ICD-10 codes (R and Z codes), were screened manually for possible FBO. Diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of all patients with FBO were recorded.RESULTS: The median patient age was 66.0 (Q1-Q3: 49.8-81.0) years, and half of the patients had experienced FBO before. Two thirds of patients (66.0%) were never diagnosed with a cause of FBO, followed by 17.3% with EoE. 30% of patients did not undergo upper endoscopy within two weeks of the hospital visit, and 50.7% were never biopsied in the oesophagus. Of 1886 hospital visits with registry ICD-10 codes that possibly reflected FBO, 8.4% were due to FBO, while FBO was present in 0.028% of the random sample of unspecific ICD-10 codes.CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalized FBO patients in the NDR in 2021 were never diagnosed with a cause. In these patients there is a high risk of overlooked EoE or upper gastrointestinal cancers. The area needs immediate focus and changed routines to improve treatment and prevent new FBO.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - Eosinophilic Esophagitis/complications
KW - Esophageal Stenosis/diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Oesophagus
KW - Oesophageal cancer
KW - Eosinophilic oesophagitis
KW - Upper Endoscopy
KW - Food Bolus obstruction
KW - Food Bolus Impaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181240671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12876-023-03077-8
DO - 10.1186/s12876-023-03077-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38166672
SN - 1471-230X
VL - 24
JO - BMC Gastroenterology
JF - BMC Gastroenterology
IS - 1
M1 - 3
ER -