A study on the criteria of internal transparency, efficiency and effectiveness in measuring local government performance

Kristian Erbou Røge, Niels Joseph Lennon

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Public managers perceive performance measurement as an indispensable element of modernising the public sector in the quest to achieve ‘more for less’, despite research showing that performance measurement in the public sector is risky in terms of unexpected and undesirable effects. Through a case study of the introduction of a performance measurement system (PMS) in a Danish municipality, our analysis focuses on how internal transparency unfolds in terms of addressing performance measures and aligning them with the criteria of efficiency and effectiveness. We conclude that there are two main reasons the PMS fails to address the desired effects in terms of modernising the municipality. First, an overarching focus by top management on outcome measurement results in inattention to the measurement of resource consumption and efficiencies. Second, empowerment of lower-level managers in the formulation of key performance indicators (KPIs) results in competence problems related to PMS design. Therefore, many of the KPIs are designed as milestone measures, chosen to constrain the influence of the PMS on daily activities. These factors hinder the organisation's ability to design KPIs that attribute costs to outputs and therefore render the goal of internal transparency impossible to achieve for the municipality. The consequence is a PMS that loses track of its very purpose along with a false sense of security among top management regarding the optimisation of scarce resources.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFinancial Accountability & Management
Vol/bind34
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)392-409
Antal sider18
ISSN0267-4424
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Fingerprint

Local government
Transparency
Performance measurement system
Municipalities
Key performance indicators
Top management
Performance measurement
Resources
Managers
Public sector
Costs
Empowerment
Factors
System design
Outcome measurement
Performance measures

Citer dette

@article{3a281f14bbaa4385a0f85bde951b7ecf,
title = "A study on the criteria of internal transparency, efficiency and effectiveness in measuring local government performance",
abstract = "Public managers perceive performance measurement as an indispensable element of modernising the public sector in the quest to achieve ‘more for less’, despite research showing that performance measurement in the public sector is risky in terms of unexpected and undesirable effects. Through a case study of the introduction of a performance measurement system (PMS) in a Danish municipality, our analysis focuses on how internal transparency unfolds in terms of addressing performance measures and aligning them with the criteria of efficiency and effectiveness. We conclude that there are two main reasons the PMS fails to address the desired effects in terms of modernising the municipality. First, an overarching focus by top management on outcome measurement results in inattention to the measurement of resource consumption and efficiencies. Second, empowerment of lower-level managers in the formulation of key performance indicators (KPIs) results in competence problems related to PMS design. Therefore, many of the KPIs are designed as milestone measures, chosen to constrain the influence of the PMS on daily activities. These factors hinder the organisation's ability to design KPIs that attribute costs to outputs and therefore render the goal of internal transparency impossible to achieve for the municipality. The consequence is a PMS that loses track of its very purpose along with a false sense of security among top management regarding the optimisation of scarce resources.",
keywords = "effectiveness, efficiency, performance measurement, public sector, transparency",
author = "R{\o}ge, {Kristian Erbou} and Lennon, {Niels Joseph}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/faam.12176",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "392--409",
journal = "Financial Accountability & Management",
issn = "0267-4424",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

A study on the criteria of internal transparency, efficiency and effectiveness in measuring local government performance. / Røge, Kristian Erbou; Lennon, Niels Joseph.

I: Financial Accountability & Management, Bind 34, Nr. 4, 2018, s. 392-409.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study on the criteria of internal transparency, efficiency and effectiveness in measuring local government performance

AU - Røge, Kristian Erbou

AU - Lennon, Niels Joseph

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Public managers perceive performance measurement as an indispensable element of modernising the public sector in the quest to achieve ‘more for less’, despite research showing that performance measurement in the public sector is risky in terms of unexpected and undesirable effects. Through a case study of the introduction of a performance measurement system (PMS) in a Danish municipality, our analysis focuses on how internal transparency unfolds in terms of addressing performance measures and aligning them with the criteria of efficiency and effectiveness. We conclude that there are two main reasons the PMS fails to address the desired effects in terms of modernising the municipality. First, an overarching focus by top management on outcome measurement results in inattention to the measurement of resource consumption and efficiencies. Second, empowerment of lower-level managers in the formulation of key performance indicators (KPIs) results in competence problems related to PMS design. Therefore, many of the KPIs are designed as milestone measures, chosen to constrain the influence of the PMS on daily activities. These factors hinder the organisation's ability to design KPIs that attribute costs to outputs and therefore render the goal of internal transparency impossible to achieve for the municipality. The consequence is a PMS that loses track of its very purpose along with a false sense of security among top management regarding the optimisation of scarce resources.

AB - Public managers perceive performance measurement as an indispensable element of modernising the public sector in the quest to achieve ‘more for less’, despite research showing that performance measurement in the public sector is risky in terms of unexpected and undesirable effects. Through a case study of the introduction of a performance measurement system (PMS) in a Danish municipality, our analysis focuses on how internal transparency unfolds in terms of addressing performance measures and aligning them with the criteria of efficiency and effectiveness. We conclude that there are two main reasons the PMS fails to address the desired effects in terms of modernising the municipality. First, an overarching focus by top management on outcome measurement results in inattention to the measurement of resource consumption and efficiencies. Second, empowerment of lower-level managers in the formulation of key performance indicators (KPIs) results in competence problems related to PMS design. Therefore, many of the KPIs are designed as milestone measures, chosen to constrain the influence of the PMS on daily activities. These factors hinder the organisation's ability to design KPIs that attribute costs to outputs and therefore render the goal of internal transparency impossible to achieve for the municipality. The consequence is a PMS that loses track of its very purpose along with a false sense of security among top management regarding the optimisation of scarce resources.

KW - effectiveness

KW - efficiency

KW - performance measurement

KW - public sector

KW - transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051033143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/faam.12176

DO - 10.1111/faam.12176

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 392

EP - 409

JO - Financial Accountability & Management

JF - Financial Accountability & Management

SN - 0267-4424

IS - 4

ER -