TY - JOUR
T1 - Abandoning fossil fuel production: What can be learned from the Danish phase-out of oil and gas?
AU - Madsen, Poul Thøis
AU - Hansen, Dennis Severin
AU - Sperling, Karl
AU - Houeland, Camilla
AU - Jenkins, Kirsten
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - In December 2020, the Danish parliament decided to terminate all oil and gas extraction by the end of 2050 ’as an important step’ to becoming climate neutral in the same year. The agreement also stated that the Danish example would have to inspire larger oil and gas-producing countries to follow suit. This perspective derives five lessons relevant to larger countries: (1) The necessity of undertaking an economic feasibility study of phasing out oil and gas. (2) Based on this work, the importance of choosing an end date, creating consensus around it and leaving sufficient time to enable a just transition and a well-managed re-orientation of public and private long-term investments. (3) Social acceptability could be achieved by developing industry-specific and regional compensation measures and systematic support for retraining and training the workforce for non-fossil fuel activities. (4) The need to develop a detailed roadmap for the phase-out, including just transition measures, but just as important, clear milestones to ensure synergy within and integration of the different parts of the energy system and elements of the transition. (5) Making the process as open and transparent as possible to make room for criticisms and improvements.
AB - In December 2020, the Danish parliament decided to terminate all oil and gas extraction by the end of 2050 ’as an important step’ to becoming climate neutral in the same year. The agreement also stated that the Danish example would have to inspire larger oil and gas-producing countries to follow suit. This perspective derives five lessons relevant to larger countries: (1) The necessity of undertaking an economic feasibility study of phasing out oil and gas. (2) Based on this work, the importance of choosing an end date, creating consensus around it and leaving sufficient time to enable a just transition and a well-managed re-orientation of public and private long-term investments. (3) Social acceptability could be achieved by developing industry-specific and regional compensation measures and systematic support for retraining and training the workforce for non-fossil fuel activities. (4) The need to develop a detailed roadmap for the phase-out, including just transition measures, but just as important, clear milestones to ensure synergy within and integration of the different parts of the energy system and elements of the transition. (5) Making the process as open and transparent as possible to make room for criticisms and improvements.
KW - Comparative policy advice
KW - Decarbonization
KW - Fossil production phase-out
KW - Supply-side decarbonization
KW - Transition
UR - https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1hX797tZ6Z-FPO
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166518996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103211
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103211
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 103
JO - Energy Research & Social Science
JF - Energy Research & Social Science
M1 - 103211
ER -