ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF USING CAMERAS ON SMALL, LOW-COST ROVS FOR SEABED MONITORING

Monitoring methods, such as seabed bottom-towed cameras, sediment grabs, and benthic sledges, have limitations in spatial coverage, cause seabed disturbance, are restricted to soft-bottom substrates, and offer low flexibility for marine seabed monitoring. In this study, we investigate the potential of a non-invasive and simple underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) to enhance marine seabed monitoring. A tethered ROV equipped with a GoPro camera was deployed in three areas of Skagerrak at depths from 15-34 m to assess accuracy in species identification and substrate classification identified from still frames. The quality of still frames varied between areas due to turbidity, motion blur, and marine snow, which reduced the number of high-quality frames by approximately 20%. Classification of substrates and taxa identification were possible in the remaining still frames. Two different substrates were detected: sand and stone reef. Stone reefs had a lower occurrence compared to sand. A total of 10 taxa were detected in the two substrate types. The highest abundance was observed in the stone reef substrate compared to the sand substrate. Identification at the species level was limited due to the quality of the still frames, which affected the detectability of morphological traits. This study demonstrates that a widely accessible ROV can be used for marine monitoring. The ROV can be used in different substrates, and still frames provide valuable information on species composition, which can enhance the replicability of monitoring programs.