Appreciable uncertainty regarding benefits and risks in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth

Thor Haahr, Anne S. Ersbøll, Mona A. Karlsen, Jens Svare, Kirstine Sneider, Lene Hee, Louise K. Weile, Agnes Ziobrowska-Bech, Claus Østergaard, Jørgen S. Jensen, Rikke B. Helmig, Niels Uldbjerg

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskning

6 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

As part of his speeches, the Roman senator Cato the Elder frequently uttered "Carthago delenda est" (Carthage must be destroyed). Similarly, Lamont and colleagues frequently utter that the "wrong patients with the wrong diagnosis were given wrong antibiotics at the wrong gestational age". We respect that Lamont and colleagues find it difficult to accept meta-analyses, which "cut a toe and a bit of a heel" to merge evidence from more publications, and we certainly cannot exclude the possibility that future research will change clinical practice. However, in contrast to Lamont and colleagues, we emphasize that not only statistical significance but also other aspects should be taken into consideration in the development of clinical recommendations (1). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Obstetrica et Gynecologica
Vol/bind96
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)251-252
ISSN0001-6349
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Appreciable uncertainty regarding benefits and risks in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater