Assembling commons and commodities

The Peruvian water law between ideology and materialisation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

The Peruvian water resources law of 2009 (Ley de Recursos Hídricos 29338) gathers contrasting - even divergent - intentions and interests; it discursively projects water to be a national common good and an economic good. The ideas behind the law connect to global currents that promote the marketisation of water rights and commodification of water services. This paper will use a historical account of water legislation in Peru as well as detailed ethnographic attention to the implementation of the water law and its infrastructure of governance in the city of Arequipa and the Quilca-Chili River Basin to analyse how the law functions as an interplay between its official text and the ways state officials use it in specific encounters with users and stakeholders. Such encounters vary and have different outcomes, at times presenting openings for groups of actors to gain influence, and at other times excluding participation. A clear-cut analytical common/commodity dichotomy is of little use when trying to understand the dynamics of governance around water in present-day Arequipa and Peru. This paper suggests 'assembling' as analytic to grasp how public and private, marketised and commodified interests come together in the implementation of the law of water resources.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftWater Alternatives
Vol/bind12
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)470-487
Antal sider18
ISSN1965-0175
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019

Fingerprint

commodity
ideology
water
Law
Peru
economic goods
governance
resources
river
legislation
stakeholder
infrastructure
participation
present
Group

Emneord

  • Water legislation
  • Water governance
  • Integrated Water Resources Management
  • State
  • ethnography
  • Peru

Citer dette

@article{89d0c2aca61344f0bcb15c52db58109d,
title = "Assembling commons and commodities: The Peruvian water law between ideology and materialisation",
abstract = "The Peruvian water resources law of 2009 (Ley de Recursos H{\'i}dricos 29338) gathers contrasting - even divergent - intentions and interests; it discursively projects water to be a national common good and an economic good. The ideas behind the law connect to global currents that promote the marketisation of water rights and commodification of water services. This paper will use a historical account of water legislation in Peru as well as detailed ethnographic attention to the implementation of the water law and its infrastructure of governance in the city of Arequipa and the Quilca-Chili River Basin to analyse how the law functions as an interplay between its official text and the ways state officials use it in specific encounters with users and stakeholders. Such encounters vary and have different outcomes, at times presenting openings for groups of actors to gain influence, and at other times excluding participation. A clear-cut analytical common/commodity dichotomy is of little use when trying to understand the dynamics of governance around water in present-day Arequipa and Peru. This paper suggests 'assembling' as analytic to grasp how public and private, marketised and commodified interests come together in the implementation of the law of water resources.",
keywords = "Water legislation, Water governance, Integrated Water Resources Management, State, ethnography, Peru, water legislation, water governance, Integrated Water Resources Management, Ethnography, State, Peru, Water legislation, Integrated water resources management, Water governance",
author = "Andersen, {Astrid Oberborbeck}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "470--487",
journal = "Water Alternatives",
issn = "1965-0175",
publisher = "Water Alternatives Association",
number = "2",

}

Assembling commons and commodities : The Peruvian water law between ideology and materialisation. / Andersen, Astrid Oberborbeck.

I: Water Alternatives, Bind 12, Nr. 2, 06.2019, s. 470-487.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assembling commons and commodities

T2 - The Peruvian water law between ideology and materialisation

AU - Andersen, Astrid Oberborbeck

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The Peruvian water resources law of 2009 (Ley de Recursos Hídricos 29338) gathers contrasting - even divergent - intentions and interests; it discursively projects water to be a national common good and an economic good. The ideas behind the law connect to global currents that promote the marketisation of water rights and commodification of water services. This paper will use a historical account of water legislation in Peru as well as detailed ethnographic attention to the implementation of the water law and its infrastructure of governance in the city of Arequipa and the Quilca-Chili River Basin to analyse how the law functions as an interplay between its official text and the ways state officials use it in specific encounters with users and stakeholders. Such encounters vary and have different outcomes, at times presenting openings for groups of actors to gain influence, and at other times excluding participation. A clear-cut analytical common/commodity dichotomy is of little use when trying to understand the dynamics of governance around water in present-day Arequipa and Peru. This paper suggests 'assembling' as analytic to grasp how public and private, marketised and commodified interests come together in the implementation of the law of water resources.

AB - The Peruvian water resources law of 2009 (Ley de Recursos Hídricos 29338) gathers contrasting - even divergent - intentions and interests; it discursively projects water to be a national common good and an economic good. The ideas behind the law connect to global currents that promote the marketisation of water rights and commodification of water services. This paper will use a historical account of water legislation in Peru as well as detailed ethnographic attention to the implementation of the water law and its infrastructure of governance in the city of Arequipa and the Quilca-Chili River Basin to analyse how the law functions as an interplay between its official text and the ways state officials use it in specific encounters with users and stakeholders. Such encounters vary and have different outcomes, at times presenting openings for groups of actors to gain influence, and at other times excluding participation. A clear-cut analytical common/commodity dichotomy is of little use when trying to understand the dynamics of governance around water in present-day Arequipa and Peru. This paper suggests 'assembling' as analytic to grasp how public and private, marketised and commodified interests come together in the implementation of the law of water resources.

KW - Water legislation

KW - Water governance

KW - Integrated Water Resources Management

KW - State

KW - ethnography

KW - Peru

KW - water legislation

KW - water governance

KW - Integrated Water Resources Management

KW - Ethnography

KW - State

KW - Peru

KW - Water legislation

KW - Integrated water resources management

KW - Water governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069445919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 470

EP - 487

JO - Water Alternatives

JF - Water Alternatives

SN - 1965-0175

IS - 2

ER -