Assessing the colour quality of LED sources: Naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference

S. Jost-Boissard, P. Avouac, Marc Fontoynont

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

40 Citationer (Scopus)

Resumé

The CIE General Colour Rendering Index is currently the criterion used to describe and measure the colour-rendering properties of light sources. But over the past years, there has been increasing evidence of its limitations particularly its ability to predict the perceived colour quality of light sources and especially some LEDs. In this paper, several aspects of perceived colour quality are investigated using a side-by-side paired comparison method, and the following criteria: naturalness of fruits and vegetables, colourfulness of the Macbeth Color Checker chart, visual appreciation (attractiveness/ preference) and colour difference estimations for both visual scenes. Forty-five observers with normal colour vision evaluated nine light sources at 3000 K, and 36 observers evaluated eight light sources at 4000 K. Our results indicate that perceived colour differences are better dealt by the CIECAM02 Uniform Colour Space. Naturalness is better described by fidelity indices even if they did not give perfect predictions for all differences between LED light sources. Colourfulness is well described by gamut-based indices and attractiveness was found to correlate best with gamut-based indices but also with a preference index or a memory index calculated without blue and purple hues. A very low correlation was found between appreciation and naturalness indicating that colour quality needs more than one metric to describe subjective aspects.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftLighting Research and Technology
Vol/bind47
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)769-794
Antal sider26
ISSN1477-1535
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 28 okt. 2015

Fingerprint

Light emitting diodes
Light sources
Color
Color vision
Vegetables
Fruits
Data storage equipment

Emneord

  • lighting technlogy

Citer dette

@article{b367a8b197a042b9b1322f29b47d8788,
title = "Assessing the colour quality of LED sources: Naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference",
abstract = "The CIE General Colour Rendering Index is currently the criterion used to describe and measure the colour-rendering properties of light sources. But over the past years, there has been increasing evidence of its limitations particularly its ability to predict the perceived colour quality of light sources and especially some LEDs. In this paper, several aspects of perceived colour quality are investigated using a side-by-side paired comparison method, and the following criteria: naturalness of fruits and vegetables, colourfulness of the Macbeth Color Checker chart, visual appreciation (attractiveness/ preference) and colour difference estimations for both visual scenes. Forty-five observers with normal colour vision evaluated nine light sources at 3000 K, and 36 observers evaluated eight light sources at 4000 K. Our results indicate that perceived colour differences are better dealt by the CIECAM02 Uniform Colour Space. Naturalness is better described by fidelity indices even if they did not give perfect predictions for all differences between LED light sources. Colourfulness is well described by gamut-based indices and attractiveness was found to correlate best with gamut-based indices but also with a preference index or a memory index calculated without blue and purple hues. A very low correlation was found between appreciation and naturalness indicating that colour quality needs more than one metric to describe subjective aspects.",
keywords = "lighting technlogy",
author = "S. Jost-Boissard and P. Avouac and Marc Fontoynont",
note = "Published online ahead of print 18 November 2014",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1177/1477153514555882",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "769--794",
journal = "Lighting Research and Technology",
issn = "1477-1535",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "7",

}

Assessing the colour quality of LED sources : Naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference. / Jost-Boissard, S.; Avouac, P.; Fontoynont, Marc.

I: Lighting Research and Technology, Bind 47, Nr. 7, 28.10.2015, s. 769-794.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the colour quality of LED sources

T2 - Naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference

AU - Jost-Boissard, S.

AU - Avouac, P.

AU - Fontoynont, Marc

N1 - Published online ahead of print 18 November 2014

PY - 2015/10/28

Y1 - 2015/10/28

N2 - The CIE General Colour Rendering Index is currently the criterion used to describe and measure the colour-rendering properties of light sources. But over the past years, there has been increasing evidence of its limitations particularly its ability to predict the perceived colour quality of light sources and especially some LEDs. In this paper, several aspects of perceived colour quality are investigated using a side-by-side paired comparison method, and the following criteria: naturalness of fruits and vegetables, colourfulness of the Macbeth Color Checker chart, visual appreciation (attractiveness/ preference) and colour difference estimations for both visual scenes. Forty-five observers with normal colour vision evaluated nine light sources at 3000 K, and 36 observers evaluated eight light sources at 4000 K. Our results indicate that perceived colour differences are better dealt by the CIECAM02 Uniform Colour Space. Naturalness is better described by fidelity indices even if they did not give perfect predictions for all differences between LED light sources. Colourfulness is well described by gamut-based indices and attractiveness was found to correlate best with gamut-based indices but also with a preference index or a memory index calculated without blue and purple hues. A very low correlation was found between appreciation and naturalness indicating that colour quality needs more than one metric to describe subjective aspects.

AB - The CIE General Colour Rendering Index is currently the criterion used to describe and measure the colour-rendering properties of light sources. But over the past years, there has been increasing evidence of its limitations particularly its ability to predict the perceived colour quality of light sources and especially some LEDs. In this paper, several aspects of perceived colour quality are investigated using a side-by-side paired comparison method, and the following criteria: naturalness of fruits and vegetables, colourfulness of the Macbeth Color Checker chart, visual appreciation (attractiveness/ preference) and colour difference estimations for both visual scenes. Forty-five observers with normal colour vision evaluated nine light sources at 3000 K, and 36 observers evaluated eight light sources at 4000 K. Our results indicate that perceived colour differences are better dealt by the CIECAM02 Uniform Colour Space. Naturalness is better described by fidelity indices even if they did not give perfect predictions for all differences between LED light sources. Colourfulness is well described by gamut-based indices and attractiveness was found to correlate best with gamut-based indices but also with a preference index or a memory index calculated without blue and purple hues. A very low correlation was found between appreciation and naturalness indicating that colour quality needs more than one metric to describe subjective aspects.

KW - lighting technlogy

U2 - 10.1177/1477153514555882

DO - 10.1177/1477153514555882

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 769

EP - 794

JO - Lighting Research and Technology

JF - Lighting Research and Technology

SN - 1477-1535

IS - 7

ER -