Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management

Christian Uhrenholdt Madsen, Susanne Boch Waldorff

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this study we explore the development and enactment of institutional logics in the field of work environment management. We show how three historically developed logics constitute different values and practices that guide professionals’ organizational action. Using both historical and contemporary qualitative data, we show how the three institutional logics are present in the field of work environment, and how the logics are enacted simultaneously by actors within four large organizations in Denmark. The study contributes to the literature on institutional logics. The logics perspective is combined with critical realism to describe the inter-relatedness between the levels of society, institutional fields, and organizations, and by elaborating the near-decomposable relations between institutional logics and orders. The study contributes to the literature on work environment management by investigating the ideational lenses through which regulations and interventions are perceived by organizational actors, and how these perceptions may lead to different organizational outcomes and outlooks in work environment management.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Management
Vol/bind35
Sider (fra-til)12-25
ISSN0956-5221
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Citer dette

@article{a436f4d07a3941ee988e23f432a100b9,
title = "Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management",
abstract = "In this study we explore the development and enactment of institutional logics in the field of work environment management. We show how three historically developed logics constitute different values and practices that guide professionals’ organizational action. Using both historical and contemporary qualitative data, we show how the three institutional logics are present in the field of work environment, and how the logics are enacted simultaneously by actors within four large organizations in Denmark. The study contributes to the literature on institutional logics. The logics perspective is combined with critical realism to describe the inter-relatedness between the levels of society, institutional fields, and organizations, and by elaborating the near-decomposable relations between institutional logics and orders. The study contributes to the literature on work environment management by investigating the ideational lenses through which regulations and interventions are perceived by organizational actors, and how these perceptions may lead to different organizational outcomes and outlooks in work environment management.",
author = "Madsen, {Christian Uhrenholdt} and Waldorff, {Susanne Boch}",
year = "2019",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "12--25",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Management",
issn = "0956-5221",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management. / Madsen, Christian Uhrenholdt; Waldorff, Susanne Boch.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Bind 35, 2019, s. 12-25.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management

AU - Madsen, Christian Uhrenholdt

AU - Waldorff, Susanne Boch

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In this study we explore the development and enactment of institutional logics in the field of work environment management. We show how three historically developed logics constitute different values and practices that guide professionals’ organizational action. Using both historical and contemporary qualitative data, we show how the three institutional logics are present in the field of work environment, and how the logics are enacted simultaneously by actors within four large organizations in Denmark. The study contributes to the literature on institutional logics. The logics perspective is combined with critical realism to describe the inter-relatedness between the levels of society, institutional fields, and organizations, and by elaborating the near-decomposable relations between institutional logics and orders. The study contributes to the literature on work environment management by investigating the ideational lenses through which regulations and interventions are perceived by organizational actors, and how these perceptions may lead to different organizational outcomes and outlooks in work environment management.

AB - In this study we explore the development and enactment of institutional logics in the field of work environment management. We show how three historically developed logics constitute different values and practices that guide professionals’ organizational action. Using both historical and contemporary qualitative data, we show how the three institutional logics are present in the field of work environment, and how the logics are enacted simultaneously by actors within four large organizations in Denmark. The study contributes to the literature on institutional logics. The logics perspective is combined with critical realism to describe the inter-relatedness between the levels of society, institutional fields, and organizations, and by elaborating the near-decomposable relations between institutional logics and orders. The study contributes to the literature on work environment management by investigating the ideational lenses through which regulations and interventions are perceived by organizational actors, and how these perceptions may lead to different organizational outcomes and outlooks in work environment management.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.11.002

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.11.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 12

EP - 25

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management

SN - 0956-5221

ER -