Projekter pr. år
Through out the Western countries welfare policies and in particular labour market policies changes quit dramatically. This is also the case in the Nordic countries, especially in Denmark, even though neo-liberal workfare strategies never have been an option. The aim of this article is to analyse the public attitudes connected to these changes in Scandinavia. Do the general public pity the unemployed? Do the unemployed pitythemselves? Are the policy makers blamed or blessed? Based on comparative surveys from Finland and Denmark including both a population sample and a large sub-sample of unemployed the paper shows that in the case of activation both the general public but also the unemployed themselves perceive the intensified ?active? policy as a plus-sum game. In terms of increased control the unemployed is more sceptic whereas the public to a very large extend is in favour ? especially in Finland. Thus, the political scene seems much more set for ?credit claming? than ?blame avoidance?. However, this cannot be seen as a road to a real workfare strategy. The country difference between Finland and Denmark and survey results based on Danish election data indicate that public support for ?harsher? labour market policy actually can be mitigated. And when it comes to lowering benefits the electorate in all the Nordic countries is remarkable conservative.
|Forlag||Centre for Comparative Welfare Studies, Institut for Økonomi, Politik og Forvaltning, Aalborg Universitet|
|Status||Udgivet - 2004|
|Navn||CCWS Working Paper|
FingeraftrykDyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Blessing or Blame? public attitude to Nordic 'workfare' in the 1990s'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.
- 1 Afsluttet
The Three Worlds of Deservingness. A comparative study of welfare regimes, deservingness criteria, and public support for welfare policy
01/02/2001 → 01/01/2007
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning