Building, breaking, overriding…? Migrants and institutional trust in the Danish welfare state

Barbara Fersch, Karen Nielsen Breidahl

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Resumé

Purpose: Migrants constitute an interesting case concerning the question of how trust in welfare state institutions can emerge, as one can study their newly built relationships with such institutions in a distinct way. The Danish welfare state can be considered a “high trust” context. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge with migrants in Denmark as a case. Design/methodology/approach: With the help of a multi-dimensional theoretical concept, this paper provides an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge. Findings: A perceived experience of distributive justice appears to be of crucial importance for building trust. Furthermore, strong trust in the systemic checks and balances of the welfare state can “override” negative experiences at its access points, that is, welfare state professionals. Research limitations/implications: Taking into account the relatively limited number of interviews, the presented claims drawn from the empirical material are limited. The aim is to reveal some (new) tendencies that can be investigated in future research. Originality/value: The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexity of trust-generating mechanisms.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Vol/bind38
Udgave nummer7-8
Sider (fra-til)592-605
Antal sider14
ISSN0144-333X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 jul. 2018

Fingerprint

welfare state
migrant
qualitative interview
distributive justice
Denmark
Migrants
Institutional trust
Welfare state
experience
methodology
interview
Values

Citer dette

@article{78c7f337fd084afeae61b4575be1a70a,
title = "Building, breaking, overriding…? Migrants and institutional trust in the Danish welfare state",
abstract = "Purpose: Migrants constitute an interesting case concerning the question of how trust in welfare state institutions can emerge, as one can study their newly built relationships with such institutions in a distinct way. The Danish welfare state can be considered a “high trust” context. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge with migrants in Denmark as a case. Design/methodology/approach: With the help of a multi-dimensional theoretical concept, this paper provides an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge. Findings: A perceived experience of distributive justice appears to be of crucial importance for building trust. Furthermore, strong trust in the systemic checks and balances of the welfare state can “override” negative experiences at its access points, that is, welfare state professionals. Research limitations/implications: Taking into account the relatively limited number of interviews, the presented claims drawn from the empirical material are limited. The aim is to reveal some (new) tendencies that can be investigated in future research. Originality/value: The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexity of trust-generating mechanisms.",
keywords = "Experiences, Institutional trust, Migrants, Qualitative, Welfare state",
author = "Barbara Fersch and Breidahl, {Karen Nielsen}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1108/IJSSP-12-2017-0177",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "592--605",
journal = "International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy",
issn = "0144-333X",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "7-8",

}

Building, breaking, overriding…? Migrants and institutional trust in the Danish welfare state. / Fersch, Barbara; Breidahl, Karen Nielsen.

I: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Bind 38, Nr. 7-8, 09.07.2018, s. 592-605.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building, breaking, overriding…? Migrants and institutional trust in the Danish welfare state

AU - Fersch, Barbara

AU - Breidahl, Karen Nielsen

PY - 2018/7/9

Y1 - 2018/7/9

N2 - Purpose: Migrants constitute an interesting case concerning the question of how trust in welfare state institutions can emerge, as one can study their newly built relationships with such institutions in a distinct way. The Danish welfare state can be considered a “high trust” context. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge with migrants in Denmark as a case. Design/methodology/approach: With the help of a multi-dimensional theoretical concept, this paper provides an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge. Findings: A perceived experience of distributive justice appears to be of crucial importance for building trust. Furthermore, strong trust in the systemic checks and balances of the welfare state can “override” negative experiences at its access points, that is, welfare state professionals. Research limitations/implications: Taking into account the relatively limited number of interviews, the presented claims drawn from the empirical material are limited. The aim is to reveal some (new) tendencies that can be investigated in future research. Originality/value: The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexity of trust-generating mechanisms.

AB - Purpose: Migrants constitute an interesting case concerning the question of how trust in welfare state institutions can emerge, as one can study their newly built relationships with such institutions in a distinct way. The Danish welfare state can be considered a “high trust” context. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge with migrants in Denmark as a case. Design/methodology/approach: With the help of a multi-dimensional theoretical concept, this paper provides an analysis of qualitative interviews with migrants on how institutional trust in the welfare state can emerge. Findings: A perceived experience of distributive justice appears to be of crucial importance for building trust. Furthermore, strong trust in the systemic checks and balances of the welfare state can “override” negative experiences at its access points, that is, welfare state professionals. Research limitations/implications: Taking into account the relatively limited number of interviews, the presented claims drawn from the empirical material are limited. The aim is to reveal some (new) tendencies that can be investigated in future research. Originality/value: The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexity of trust-generating mechanisms.

KW - Experiences

KW - Institutional trust

KW - Migrants

KW - Qualitative

KW - Welfare state

UR - https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2017-0177

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048865475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJSSP-12-2017-0177

DO - 10.1108/IJSSP-12-2017-0177

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 592

EP - 605

JO - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

JF - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

SN - 0144-333X

IS - 7-8

ER -