TY - GEN
T1 - Cassius Dio, Politician and Historian
AU - Madsen, Jesper Majbom
AU - Lange, Carsten Hjort
PY - 2021/5/27
Y1 - 2021/5/27
N2 - When approaching Cassius Dio as a historian, we must not forget Cassius Dio the politician and vice versa. He provides us with one of our most important surviving narratives of Roman history. But even if he lived late in the Principate, he unsurprisingly tried to understand the past he studied as an historian. This of course does not rule out the possibility of a specific take on the past. Dio was a political theorist inasmuch as he looked at Roman history through the lens of his preferred political system, monarchy (Rich 1989; Lange 2019a; Madsen 2019). Taking his cue from Thucydides, Dio’s ideal political system supposedly suppressed the worst effects of human nature, limiting stasis and civil war. Violence, political upheaval, and civil war was an integrated part of his contemporary world, but also the ghost of the past—a ghost the historian Dio tried to understand and explain to his readers. Consequently, the Roman History is also the story of how Rome ended up with monarchy; the most stable form of government even if sole rule had many flaws (Rich 1989, 92). Dio’s approach has unsatisfactorily been described as one from hindsight, but it should instead be understood as a question of understanding the past (contra Mitchell, Morrell, Osgood & Welch 2019, 3). Dio needs to be judged as a historian case by case, and his work in its textual and contextual context. Keywords: Roman historiography; Cassius Dio
AB - When approaching Cassius Dio as a historian, we must not forget Cassius Dio the politician and vice versa. He provides us with one of our most important surviving narratives of Roman history. But even if he lived late in the Principate, he unsurprisingly tried to understand the past he studied as an historian. This of course does not rule out the possibility of a specific take on the past. Dio was a political theorist inasmuch as he looked at Roman history through the lens of his preferred political system, monarchy (Rich 1989; Lange 2019a; Madsen 2019). Taking his cue from Thucydides, Dio’s ideal political system supposedly suppressed the worst effects of human nature, limiting stasis and civil war. Violence, political upheaval, and civil war was an integrated part of his contemporary world, but also the ghost of the past—a ghost the historian Dio tried to understand and explain to his readers. Consequently, the Roman History is also the story of how Rome ended up with monarchy; the most stable form of government even if sole rule had many flaws (Rich 1989, 92). Dio’s approach has unsatisfactorily been described as one from hindsight, but it should instead be understood as a question of understanding the past (contra Mitchell, Morrell, Osgood & Welch 2019, 3). Dio needs to be judged as a historian case by case, and his work in its textual and contextual context. Keywords: Roman historiography; Cassius Dio
UR - https://brill.com/view/title/59992
U2 - 10.1163/9789004461604_002
DO - 10.1163/9789004461604_002
M3 - Article in proceeding
SN - 978-90-04-46148-2
T3 - Historiography of Rome and Its Empire Series
SP - 1
EP - 21
BT - Cassius Dio the Historian
A2 - Lange, Carsten Hjort
A2 - Madsen, Jesper Majbom
PB - Brill
CY - Leiden & Boston
ER -